"A
guy gets interviewed by a top Israeli general to be an Israeli
spy. As a test, the general asks, 'If you had a chance to kill an Arab
or a cat, which one would you kill first?' ''Why the cat?' 'You're hired!'
the general says."
Joke told by an ulta-Orthodox Jew to Stephen Bloom,
POSTVILLE: A CLASH OF CULTURES IN HEARTLAND AMERICA,
A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Inc. San Diego New York London, 2001, p. 224
"Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East,
I can't help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle
East." -- John Sheehan, S.J. (a Jesuit priest)
|
Investigation
and Outrage, ABC News, November 23,
2001
"The deaths of the five schoolchildren in the Khan Younis refugee
camp has raised tension on the eve of a new U.S. diplomatic push to
stop more than a year of fighting. A senior Palestinian official charged
that the United States has already taken Israel's side, noting that
Washington invited Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to visit even
before U.S. mediators began their mission, while Palestinians were being
killed ... Initial reports from both sides after the Thursday blast
said the children found an unexploded tank shell on their way to school
and set it off accidentally. However, reports emerged today that the
blast was caused by a bomb Israeli forces planted, aiming at Palestinian
gunmen who use the area to fire rifles and mortars at nearby Israeli
army posts and settlements ... Palestinian Information Minister Yasser
Abed Rabbo blamed Israel for what he called the 'assassination of our
children.' He called on the United States and Europe to press Israel
to pull its troops back from Palestinian population centers."
U.N. Criticizes
Israel's Policies Toward Palestinians, Yahoo!
News (from Reuters), December 4, 2001
"With barely a nod to the weekend suicide attacks in Israel, the
U.N. General Assembly called on Monday for self-determination for the
Palestinian people, Israel's withdrawal from the Golan Heights and an
end to the presence of a small number of embassies in Jerusalem. The
six nonbinding resolutions, which included three on U.N. programs and
committees for Palestinian rights, were adopted this year as in previous
years by an overwhelming majority, with no major changes in the wording.
New was a split in the European Union after Britain attempted to get
language on civilian deaths in the resolution on the 'peaceful settlement
of the question of Palestine.' When that was rejected, EU members Britain,
Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark abstained, joined by Australia,
Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Germany, Paraguay, Poland,
Romania, Rwanda, Macedonia and others. The final vote was still 131
in favour to 6 against, but with 20 abstentions, a higher number than
usual. The United States, Israel and the Pacific nations of Marshall
Islands, Micronesia, Nauru and Tuvalu cast the 'no' votes."
Palestinian
Terrorists are Desperate, Not Cowardly,
Guardian, December 3, 2001
"The two young Palestinians who brought such horror to west Jerusalem
on Saturday night, or the others who died in the debris of buses across
the country yesterday, are like the 19 young Arabs who staged September
11: dead by their own hands, blown to pieces with their victims. You
may heap any combination of adjectives on them you like. But leave 'cowardly'
out of the equation. Desperation carries its own lexicon ... [A Palestinian
suicide attack at] Ben Yehuda Street [in Jerusalem] is a wake-up call
for both sides of that divide. Does 'democracy' guarantee peace? No:
the intractabilities of democracy brought Israel a prime minister called
Sharon. Can heavy artillery win the day? No: heavy artillery is part
of the problem, not the solution. Does the west have enough clout -
and resolution - to impose a settlement? No: it merely mixes passionate
adjectives with irresolution. Is there any prospect, apart from the
lull of exhaustion, of draining the blood from this bath? Dream on.
The nightmare of Israel gives us a glimpse of other nightmares of desperation
in waiting. And it is cowardly to pretend otherwise."
Israel
Rejects Conventions Criticism, Washington
Post, December 5, 2001
"Israel denied Wednesday it was breaching Geneva Conventions on
warfare in occupied Palestinian territories and said an international
conference had no right to even raise the issue. The declaration by
114 countries deplored the killing of civilians, particularly children,
in the ongoing violence between Israel and Palestinian militants. The
Israeli Foreign Ministry termed the meeting a 'futile exercise and an
abuse of a humanitarian instrument.' The countries represented were
signatories to the 1949 Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war. Yaakov
Levy, Israel's ambassador to the international organizations in
Geneva, said the conference declaration was 'clearly one-sided' and
contained 'unsubstantiated allegations.' The declaration did not contain
specific allegations, but demanded Israel 'immediately refrain from
committing grave breaches' of the conventions, such as the intentional
killings of Palestinians."
Palestinians
Strip Searched by IDF in Gaza,
Haaretz [Israeli newspaper], December 6, 2001
"Six Palestinians were ordered to strip to their underwear at an
Israeli army checkpoint in the Gaza Strip yesterday after which they
were forced to march back and forth in the rain before being taken away
in a jeep, according to witnesses. The incident, which took place near
the Kfar Darom settlement in central Gaza, unfolded in front of hundreds
of people waiting to cross the checkpoint and was partly recorded on
videotape by a Reuters television crew ... The men were forced
to undress near the van and walk one at a time toward troops positioned
near an armored vehicle, the witnesses said. One of the six was then
sent back to retrieve their clothes after no explosives were found in
them. A soldier dragged the clothes through a puddle on the rain-drenched
tarmac before letting the men get dressed, the witnesses said. Opposition
leader MK Yossi Sarid (Meretz) demanded an explanation from Defense
Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer about the incident. 'If these were
the orders, they are disgraceful and unacceptable,' Sarid said."
High Court Denies Palestinian Detainee Legal Process,
Haaretz, December 8, 2001
"The High Court of [Israeli] Justice has refused to let a lawyer
tell his client, a Palestinian administrative detainee, of his right
to remain silent and not to incriminate himself. The court further ruled
that the detainee cannot even be told he has a lawyer - Andre Rosenthal,
who was hired by concerned parties. The ruling, issued on November 27,
was in response to a petition by the detainee, Osama Ali Sritah, and
the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel. The petition asked that
Sritah, who was arrested in late October, be allowed to see an attorney.
After hearing the Shin Bet security service's reasons for opposing
such a meeting, Justices Mishael Cheshin, Dalia Dorner and
Tova Strasberg-Cohen ruled that the needs of the investigation
justified the prohibition. They wrote: 'The petitioner [Sritah] knows
he has been forbidden to meet a lawyer, but attorney Rosenthal is not
content with this, and asks that the petitioner be told that an external
party has provided a lawyer to represent him, that being attorney Rosenthal
... We were convinced [by the Shin Bet] that informing the petitioner
of this, in addition to informing him that he may not see a lawyer,
would impair the efficacy of the investigation ... Attorney Rosenthal
also asks that he be allowed to inform the petitioner in writing that
he has the right to remain silent during interrogation and not incriminate
himself. In this matter as well, we heard the respondent [Shin Bet]
and its representatives, and were convinced that the good of the investigation
and the security of the region require us not to accede to attorney
Rosenthal's request.'"
Former Israeli prime minister (and former Irgun
terrorist) Menachem Begin's Perspectives on Terrorism [from his
book, The Revolt]
Thailand
Plans Lawsuit Against Israel for Exploiting Its Foreign Workers,
Migrants Contre Le Sida [originally from Haaretz), July 19, 1999
"The Thai government is considering filing a multi-million dollar
lawsuit against the government of Israel, the Moshav Movement and local
manpower agencies for failing to honor their contracts with Thai workers.
Thai ambassador to Israel Domedeg Bunnag said in an interview with Ha'aretz
that earlier this month, he called on the Moshav Movement and the manpower
agencies that handle Thai agricultural workers to increase the pay of
their Thai workers at least to the legal minimum wage. He said that
if the workers' conditions were not improved, his government would no
longer permit Israel to import Thai workers. 'I am almost moved to tears
when I see the conditions of Thai workers in Israel. They live in sub-human
conditions, and are constantly exploited by both the moshav owners and
the manpower agencies,' he said. Some 80 percent of the workers are
not paid the minimum wage stipulated by law, do not receive wage slips,
are not paid overtime and are generally deprived of rights they do not
even know they have ... . Each Thai worker is cheated out of 22 shekels
per day by Israeli employers paying less than the minimum wage ... 'I
have informed them that if this situation is not rectified by September,
my government will order all Thai workers in Israel to return home,
and will cancel all permits regarding the importation of Thai laborers
to Israel.' The ambassador had harsh words for the Israeli employers
exploiting the workers. 'They live in horrible sub-standard conditions,
four or five workers sharing a small, old and underventilated caravan.
They are charged a monthly rent of 600 shekels for this privilege.'
He also criticized the employers for endangering their workers' health
... 'Many workers return home sick with respiratory deseases, the result
of not being given adequate protective gear when handling hazardous
pesticides.' Bunnag also accused Israeli employers of cheating their
Thai workers by overcharging them for their airfare here. He said the
Thai government is planning to file a $30 million lawsuit for compensation
to workers overcharged and underpaid by their employers, unless the
relevant Israeli authorities do something to compensate the defrauded
workers."
PLO Hurls
Hate at "Mafia" Mike, New York Post,
December 11, 2001
"Mike Bloomberg hasn't even taken office, but he's already
received the standard greeting that the PLO reserves for New York City
mayors: undisguised hostility. A Palestinian spokesman yesterday blasted
the mayor-elect as 'part of the Mafia' after Bloomberg compared Yasser
Arafat to Osama bin Laden during a whirlwind trip to Israel over the
weekend. 'He should consult with the Mafia, the Mafia that elected him,'
said Palestinian Information Minister Yasser Abed Rabbo. 'He is part
of the Mafia and he does not know anything about human suffering.' During
an interview broadcast on Israeli Radio, Bloomberg was asked if he agreed
with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's description of Arafat as
Israel's bin Laden. 'Certainly, they are both terrorists,' Bloomberg
responded. 'You can compare them any way you want. But I think there
is no question that the terrorism that America has suffered at the hands
of bin Laden is very similar to the terrorism that Israel has had to
suffer for a long time' ...Six years ago, a PLO spokesman denounced
Mayor [Rudy] Giuliani as 'a puppet of the Jews' when he ordered Arafat
to leave a Lincoln Center concert. Giuliani, who joined Bloomberg and
Gov. Pataki in Israel, said he's not afraid to declare that he's on
the side of the Jewish state over the Palestinians. 'I do favor one
side,' said the mayor."
Tourist
Killer Suffers from Post-Trauma Syndrome,
Haaretz, December 12, 2001
"Daniel Okev, who murdered a British tourist in cold blood
and badly injured his companion, has been classified as a disabled veteran
of Israel Defense Forces suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome
after hunting down terrorists as a member of the Rimon commando unit.
Okev's receiving disability benefits is disclosed in a Supreme Court
appeal submitted last week by his attorney, David Yiftah. In
10 days the Court is scheduled to review another appeal submitted by
the State Prosecutor's Office, protesting the Be'er Sheva District Court's
decision not to confer a sentence of life imprisonment for the murder
and assault on the two English tourists. Okev is serving a 20-year sentence;
his penalty was reduced due to psychiatric evaluations attesting to
his 'extreme psychological' problems."
Palestinians
Condemns U.S. Veto at U.N., CNN, December
15, 2001
"Palestinian officials reacted angrily to the U.S. veto early Saturday
morning of a U.N. resolution that would have cleared the way for international
monitors in the West Bank and Gaza. John Negroponte, the U.S. ambassador
to the United Nations, said Washington vetoed the resolution because
it failed to note recent suicide attacks against Israelis or name the
organizations responsible. 'I just want to ask President Bush one question,'
chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told CNN. 'What if Texas, or
any part of the United States, were to come under foreign occupation?
Would you call upon the American people to surrender to this occupation?
For God's sake, what should have been vetoed last night was Israeli
occupation' ... It is the second time in less than a year that Washington
has vetoed a resolution that would have created a monitoring mechanism
to protect Palestinian civilians."
'Israeli
Death Squads Disarmed Men and Shot Them,'
Independent [Great Britain], December 15,
2001
"The Israeli Foreign Minister, Shimon Peres, says some of
his government's military strikes against the Palestinians make him
'shudder.' Mr Peres would have had good reason to shudder yesterday,
had he listened to the testimonies of the residents of Salfit. They
described in detail how an Israeli undercover death squad arrived in
the West Bank town in a pre-dawn raid and shot two young policemen at
close range as they lay unarmed on the ground. The Israeli soldiers,
dressed in black, spoke Arabic so fluently that Iman Herzala - who heard
them talking in the street outside her house - at first wondered whether
they were Palestinian forces taking part in a training exercise. But
that was before she saw the executions, less than 100 yards from her
front door. Residents had scraped earth over the spot, but yesterday
afternoon patches of blood were visible. A low wall bore the marks of
several bullets. Looking hollow-eyed and distressed, Mrs Herzala, 37,
who has six children, described the last moments of Dia Nabil Mahmoud,
19, and Abdul Ashour, 22. They were among seven people to be killed
by the Israelis yesterday in raids on more than four communities in
the occupied territories as Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister,
increased his military pressure on the Palestinians. At the same time,
Israeli tanks and bulldozers carried out their biggest housing demolition
of the intifada at Khan Younis in the Gaza strip, knocking down 35 houses
and making 345 people homeless."
Israel Protests Hitler-Sharon Comparsion in 'Der Spiegel,'
Haaretz, December 18, 2001
"Israel's ambassador protested to Germany's leading news magazine
Monday for publishing a column comparing Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's
hard-line stand toward the Palestinians to policies pursued by Adolf
Hitler. Penned by publisher Rudolf Augstein, one of Germany's best-known
journalists, the column in the weekly Der Spiegel said Sharon
would only pave the way to power for a more radical generation of Palestinians
if he brings about Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's demise
... Augstein vented frustration at what he portrayed as German self-restraint
in confronting the Jewish state's policies. Referring to outspoken criticism
of Israel in the French press, he said, "In France one can say that,
but apparently not in Germany."
Middle
East Policy Suffers from Subservience to Israel, by Georgie Anne
Geyer,
uexpress.com, (from Universal Press Syndicate)
December 18, 2001
"In Israel/Palestine, to the contrary, the president has put American
power and interests under not just Israel, but under an Israeli leadership
with a famously shady political and military past. He has not declared,
much less enforced, American interests in the area. He has accepted
an historical interpretation of events in the region that is highly
questionable. And he seems to tend increasingly toward an overreach
that could involve everything from marching through Iraq, to invading
Iran, to wiping out whole clans in Somalia ... The core of the problem
is that President Bush has put American power behind the no-compromise
line of Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon. The legendary
and respected Israeli Labor Party is bitterly critical of Sharon --
but the Bush White House ignores it. So American power and principle
are seen by the world -- rightly, in fact -- as approving of Sharon's
ongoing Jewish settlements on Palestinian land, his intention that eventually
the Palestinians should be moved to Jordan, and his assassination squads
against Palestinian militants. In fact, when the president sent Gen.
Zinni, one of our most admired retired officers, to the Middle East
several weeks ago, ostensibly as a 'negotiator,' he was really putting
the envoy under the Israeli prime minister's direction. Simple political
psychology tells us that someone can hardly be a disinterested and fair
negotiator when his government's position so flagrantly favors one side."
South
African Jews Polarized Over Israel, Washington
Post, December 19, 2001
"It is a brief document, occupying less than half a page in a local
newspaper here. But since the 'declaration of conscience' was published
10 days ago, it has polarized South African Jews like no issue since
the collapse of white-minority rule seven years ago. Written by two
Jewish heroes of South Africa's liberation struggle against the white
government's apartheid system, and signed by 220 Jews, the document
asserts that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is the cause
of the escalating violence in the Middle East and denounces Israel's
campaign of violence. Titled 'Not In My Name,' the declaration acknowledges
Israel's right to exist and its valid security concerns but compares
Israel's treatment of Palestinians to the oppression of South Africa's
black majority under apartheid. 'It becomes difficult,' Ronnie Kasrils
and Max Ozinsky write, 'particularly from a South African perspective,
not to draw parallels with the oppression experienced by Palestinians
under the hand of Israel and the oppression experienced in South Africa
under apartheid rule.'"
Blair
Fears Split with U.S. Over Its Support for Israel,
Guardian, December 16, 2001
"Tony Blair fears a major split with America over the Middle East
peace process as Israel continues to bombard northern and southern parts
of Gaza in its search for terrorist suspects. Number 10 sources have
told The Observer that domestic considerations will force President
Bush to stand foursquare behind Israel despite Blair's desire for a
'lasting peace' to be rapidly negotiated. Bush, who won the presidency
by only a handful of votes, believes any move against Israel will irritate
the American Jewish lobby, which is described as 'increasingly right-wing'.
He failed to pick up much Jewish support in the election and is trying
to improve his performance."
U.S. Has No Option But to Force A Solution on Mideast, by Molly
Ivins,
Common Dreams (from Chicago Tribune), December
20, 2001
"In yet another essay (lots to read these days), Robert Friedman
reminds us in The Nation, 'In the 1980s, a messianic Jewish underground,
which staged bombing attacks on democratically elected Palestinian West
Bank mayors and machine-gunned Palestinian students who were eating
their lunch at Hebron University, was caught planning to blow up the
Muslim holy sites and replace them with the Third Jewish Temple.' It
is quite possible those folks were encouraged by the fact that the then-prime
minister of Israel was Menachem Begin, himself a one-time terrorist.
Definitionally speaking, we probably need a separate category for terrorists
who become prime ministers."
Looking
Out for Number One, Haaretz, December
28, 2001
"Iansa, a journal on strategic studies published in India, came
out with a stunning report in August, quoting defense sources there
as saying that 'Israel is positioned to replace Russia' as India's main
weapons supplier. According to the journal, Israel is already the number
two arms supplier after Russia; it says the deals so far signed or in
the works with India are worth some $3 billion. SIBAT doesn't publish
data on the scope of weapons deals with individual countries, but the
impression from the Defense Ministry is that India has become the main
market for Israeli weapons systems - sales are already in the range
of $800 million a year, about the same as sales to the U.S."
Women May Not Be Harassed,
But They Can Be Sold, Middle East Media Research
Institute (originally from Haaretz), April 25, 2000
"The discrepancy in women's position in Israel is reflected in
two laws: One recently enacted, and the other as yet not in existence.
Israel has a law against sexual harassment, but has no law forbidding
trade in women. One may not harass women, but selling them is legal
... There is a law against solicitation and pimping, which could be
used to eradicate the trade in women, but the police does very little
to enforce it. And when it does, it arrests or deports the prostitutes
- in other words harms the victims - in an attempt to gather information
on criminal acts not at all connected to the trade in women. Public
Security Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami admitted recently in a meeting
of the Knesset House Committee that 'the [fight against the] trade in
women is not defined as a goal on the police commissioner's list of
goals.' It is, apparently, not important enough ... The fact that Israel
has become an international center of trade in women should have enraged
public opinion in a country that is half-theocratic. But it has not.
Occasionally the issue is discussed, mainly by various women's organizations.
That is all. When members of the Knesset Committee for the Advancement
of Women visited 'massage' and escort parlors in Tel Aviv several months
ago, the media focused more on MK Zevulun Orlev's (National Religious
Party) refusal to enter the parlors, than on the shocking condition
of the terrified women found there. Ha'aretz reporter Einat Fishbain
noted in her report on the following day that the atmosphere during
the tour was light-hearted. The police officers accompanying the MKs
demonstrated a great deal of knowledge on what goes on inside the parlors,
but the police do not intervene except in cases of 'criminal occurences.'
Prostitution is not considered a 'criminal occurence,' despite the fact
that the police know that offenses much more severe than drug abuse
are committed against a large percentage of the women in these parlors."
Leading Israeli Journalist Understands Arab
Holocaust Denial, by Yaron London,
Middle East Media Research Institute, Special Dispatch 85 - Israel,
April 11, 2000
"Israel compared to a Rapist: 'What is the reaction of a man whose
daughter was raped when he is asked to recognize the suffering of the
rapist who was abused by his parents in his childhood? The reaction
will be on a scale between a disinterest in the villain's future and
denial of the facts relating to his life's circumstances. If the rapist…
claims that he was attacked by the ten year old girl and only responded
to her provocation - the father of the raped child will not only be
unwilling to hear about the rapist's hardships, but will also try to
cause him physical harm. Would that be just? Yes, it would.' 'The rape
of the earth, mother earth, their land, is a common metaphor in Palestinian
poetry and literature. Read early Zionist texts and you will find the
same metaphors, but in Hebrew they discuss the exiling of the Jews from
Zion. The Zionist myth does not ask, 'who was at fault' in the Great
Revolt [against] the Romans, the Jews or the Romans? Likewise, the Palestinian
myth does not ask 'whose fault' were the shooting skirmishes that preceded
the 1948 war. We are their Romans, but from our Arab citizens we took
away even their right to mourn. Is it difficult to understand why so
many of the Arabs repay us by denying our Holocaust?'"
Response to My Correspondents, by Paul Gottfried, lewrockwell.com
"I reiterate this already stated
view, lest the usual suspects beat up on me as a 'self-hating Jew.'
What I was pointing to is how the depiction of a pluralistic Israel,
fighting against Palestinians for global democratic values, permeates
the reconstructed American Right. By now it is the indispensable litmus
test for would-be media conservatives, and for employees of beltway
neocon thinktanks. But the prevalence of this misrepresentation does
not signify that Israel has no right to fend for itself against would-be
destroyers. I am simply suggesting that American conservatives should
stop being the shills of rightwing Israeli annexationists – or at least
register as the agents of the Likud Party ... . Although its ethnic
nationalist character does not bother me personally, it is absurd to
pretend that Israel meets the standards of democratic universalism attributed
to it by neocons. Such fantasists are always at pains to present Israel
as a peerless paradigm of whatever the U.S. is supposed to be at a particular
point in its lurching history. Israel is not a microcosm of multicultural
New York (nor need it be to justify its existence), except to the extent
that it has to deal with unwelcome Arab 'diversity' ... But now that
this subject has been broached, it might be well to note that strong
support for Jewish nationalism exists on the liberal Left as well as
among neocons. One need only check out back issues of New Republic
and the Salon websites for evidence of this contention. The
Peretz-Emerson-Pipes-Dershowitz line that I keep encountering is that
Israel is a bulwark of Western secular pluralism. Because of "our values"
and the culpability of American goyim in sitting on their anti-Semitic
hands during the Holocaust, the U.S. must do everything in its military
power to help Israel against Arab theocrats and crypto-Nazis. Just because
the American Right is coming to sound like AIPAC headquarters does not
mean that the same no longer is true on the other side. When, by the
way, was the last time that such known advocates of the Israeli Right
as Steve Emerson, Bill Safire, George Will, and Daniel Pipes were not
allowed to express themselves in the liberal national press or on TV?"
Detention
and Beatings Underlie Degradation of Respect for Human Rights,
Amnesty International, January 3, 2002
"The detention and beating of a prominent doctor and human rights
defender,
and the beating of members of an international delegation underlines
the Israeli
authorities' apparent disregard for basic human rights during the current
intifada, Amnesty International said today. Dr. Mustafa Barghhouti,
President of the Union of Palestinian Medical Relief Committees, was
arrested on 2 January2002 after a press conference with the participation
of an international delegation including Members of the European Parliament
(MEPs) and delegates from the USA and many European countries. Dr. Barghouti
was arrested as he left the conference -- where he had spoken about
the disastrous impact on medicaltreatment and care of the Israeli closures
of towns and villages in the OccupiedTerritories -- on the grounds that
he had no Israeli passport to enter Jerusalem,where he was born. He
was released at al-Ram checkpoint between Jerusalem and Ramallah after
four hours' detention at the Moscobiyeh Detention Centre in Jerusalem.
The beating by Israeli border police took place later that day at the
al-Ram checkpoint as international delegates protested at attempts to
rearrest Dr. Barghouti. Dr. Barghouti was released after an huor, with
a fractured kneecap and various lacerations and bruises on his face
and body. Some international delegates, including Italian MEP Luisa
Morgantini, suffered bruises and other injuries."
Firestone to Retire from [Canadian] Senate,
Canadian Jewish News, January 3, 2002
"Sheila Finestone's 18-year political career will end Jan.
28 when she reaches the Senate's mandatory retirement age of 75 ...
Finestone, who described herself as "a mother, a politician, a Canadian,
a Québécoise and a Jewish woman," spoke first of her "ancestral land,"
Israel and her hope that the current conflict can be resolved through
dialogue ... Finestone has been an active member of the Inter-Parliamentary
Union (IPU) which brings together elected officials of 144 countries
- including many that are not true democracies. (The group has not granted
Israel full membership.) She serves as Canadian chair and is on its
12-member executive committee. 'That election was remarkable because
I have taken my share of taunts for making representations for Israel.
I've been call an Israeli agent and Mrs. Israel, but I'm proud to be
acknowledged as a concerned member of the Jewish people.'"
Israel-Backed
Event Draws Top Liberals, Globe and Mail,
January 8, 2002
"An influential group of Canadian Liberal MPs, led by Deputy Prime
Minister
Herb Gray, is lending its support to Israel by attending a conference
of Jewish politicians organized by the Israeli government. More than
50 legislators from Europe, the Americas and South Africa are attending
the four-day meeting in Jerusalem, sponsored by the Israeli Ministry
of Foreign Affairs. 'I made the decision [to come] because I am a Jew,'
said Anita Neville, a rookie MP from Winnipeg. 'I have a large
Jewish community in my riding, and I care deeply about the nature of
the relationship between Canada and Israel.' Five of Canada's six Jewish
MPs are attending, along with two Liberal senators. Although the United
States has a larger delegation, Canada is the only country to be represented
by two senior ministers, Mr. Gray and Immigration Minister Elinor
Caplan. Ms. Caplan said she sees no problem wearing 'two hats,'
one as a Canadian minister and another as a supporter of Israel."
A Gaza Diary, by Chris Hodges (NY Times reporter),
Harpers, p. 7 (online), October 2001
"And then, out of the dry furnace air, a disembodied voice crackles
over a loudspeaker. 'Come on, dogs,' the voice booms in Arabic. 'Where
are all the dogs of Khan Younis? Come! Come!' I stand up. I walk outside
the hut. The invective continues to spew: 'Son of a bitch!' 'Son of
a whore!' 'Your mother's cunt!' The boys dart in small packs up the
sloping dunes to the electric fence that separates the camp from the
Jewish settlement. They lob rocks toward two armored jeeps parked on
top of the dune and mounted with loudspeakers. Three ambulances line
the road below the dunes in anticipation of what is to come. A percussion
grenade explodes. The boys, most no more than ten or eleven years old,
scatter, running clumsily across the heavy sand. They descend out of
sight behind a sandbank in front of me. There are no sounds of gunfire.
The [Israeli] soldiers shoot with silencers. The bullets from the M-16
rifles tumble end over end through the children's slight bodies. Later,
in the hospital, I will see the destruction: the stomachs ripped out,
the gaping holes in limbs and torsos. Yesterday at this spot the Israelis
shot eight young men, six of whom were under the age of eighteen. One
was twelve. This afternoon they kill an eleven-year-old boy, Ali Murad,
and seriously wound four more, three of whom are under eighteen. Children
have been shot in other conflicts I have covered — death squads gunned
them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined
up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their
sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I
have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a
trap and murder them for sport."
Rabbi
Launches Israel Attack, Totally Jewish,
October 31, 2001
"Rabbi Dr David Goldberg, the senior rabbi at the Liberal
Jewish Synagogue in St John’s Wood, branded the country 'the last colonial
power in the world.' In an article in a leading London newspaper, he
said the gap between Israeli political actions and Jewish ethical teachings
will no longer be bridgeable. He said: 'People are not willing to articulate
it yet, but depending on how the Palestinian problem is resolved, that
will determine the attitude of the diaspora Jew towards Israel. However
much we support Israel and the notion of a Jewish state, dominating
another people with no end in sight does not sit easily on a Jewish
conscience' ... .But in Britain, Rabbi Dr David Goldberg has found himself
increasingly isolated, with the majority of Anglo-Jewry agreeing that
it is important to show solidarity with Israel at this time ...Peter
Sheldon, president of the United Synagogue, added: 'This is a time
to stand together with the people of Israel. Any dissent should be expressed
privately. Our enemies need no assistance. The small, beleaguered state
of Israel needs our support. Rabbi Goldberg represents a very small
minority of the Jewish community with his views on Israel.'"
Evening
Standard in Israel Row, Totally Jewish,
October 26, 2001
"A columnist in the Evening Standard has been universally
condemned by Jewish leaders after suggesting that Israel does not have
the right to exist. Writing in Monday’s Standard, AN Wilson said: 'The
logic of supporting the Palestinians is to question the very right of
the state of Israel to exist.' During his article Wilson describes Israel
as the '1948 experiment' and claims the Israelis 'right' to exist as
a state rests on the fact 'a few brave terrorists such as Menachem Begin
killed some British army officers.' 'What greater act of "terrorism"
asks Wilson, 'can there be than Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon's
policy of invasion, backed up by (American-made) tanks and bombs?' He
continues: 'Israel is by definition an aggressor, since it is occupying
land that was already someone else's homeland.' And he even advocates
sending American ground-troops into the disputed lands to 'force out
the illegal Jewish occupiers' otherwise 'no one in the world is going
to believe in American foreign policy in the Muslim world.' Wilson concludes:
'One now sees that Israel never was a state, and it can only be defended
by constant war. Is that what we want?' But he also concedes 'we do
not want the Israelis to be "driven into the sea.”' The Evening Standard
was inundated with responses from infuriated members of the public
following the publication of the articles. Tuesday’s edition of the
Standard featured a large letters page reflecting both concern and support
for Wilson. Most notable was an article by Professor Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks in the Standard which slammed Wilson’s article as “deeply
shocking” adding “no one with a moral sense should say such things.'"
Levy's
Dual Role Attacked, Totally Jewish,
October 2, 2001
"Lord Levy has come under fire again from critics who believe
his role as the prime minister’s special Middle East envoy conflicts
with his post as Labour’s chief fundraiser. Tam Dalyell is among the
MPs to have raised questions about Levy’s involvement in the flagging
peace process. He said: “To have a fundraiser in a senior diplomatic
position is very much the American style, and I’m concerned about the
Americanisation of Downing Street. It is personalised Blair government.'"
Rabbi Gafni
Calls for Pathologist's Suspension in Body Parts Scandal,
Dei'ah Ve Dibur, January 9, 2002
"MK Rabbi Moshe Gafni called for the immeidate firing or
suspension of Professor Yehuda Hiss, head of the L. Greenberg
Institute of Forensic Medicine at Abu Kabir, over the retention of parts
from autopsied soldiers' bodies. On Monday it was revealed that a soldier's
skull was on display in a glass case, and most of his body was held
in the Institute, in violation of the law and of basic principles of
human decency. The family of the soldier was not aware of the situation
and had not approved it. But MK Anat Maor, chairman of the Knesset
Science and Technology Committee, also called on Health Minister
Nissim Dahan to suspend Hiss immediately. The ministry, which owns
and supervises the institute, had last week identified body tissue illegally
stored there as belonging to four soldiers whose bodies had been autopsied.
The soldiers' families had been informed by the Israel Defense Forces
that the parts, including skull fragments, had been identified as belonging
to their dear ones."
Environmental
Slate Tries to Prove It's Easy to Be Both Green and Zionist,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), January
10, 2002
"A new Zionist party wants to mix blue and white with green. For
the first time, an environmental Jewish party has gathered enough signatures
to get onto the ballot for the upcoming elections to the World Zionist
Congress. The Green Zionists Alliance got the boost from more than 600
signatures on a petition, which qualified them to run in the upcoming
World Zionist Congress elections ... The launching of the party is more
than just a call for environmental improvements in Israel, members of
the party slate say. A Jewish environmental party also can attract those
unaffiliated Jews to play a role in the Zionist movement, they argue.
'Five Minutes of Your Time Will Save Israel´s Environment and Breathe
New Life Into The Zionist Movement,' the group´s Web site claims ...
American and Israeli environmentalists first seriously discussed the
idea of launching a party last year ... 'Zionism stands not just for
returning the people to the land, but also the care of that very land
so that the Jewish people may thrive on it,' [Rabbi Michael Cohen]
said ... Adam Werbach, a member of the Green Zionist Alliance
slate, says there are a lot of young Jews who do not make connections
between their support for Israel and their support for social justice
issues, but backing conservation in Israel is something they can understand.
Werbach, a former national president of the Sierra Club who now consults
and produces video projects for environmental organizations, believes
the party will help Zionism reflect what many young American Jews support."
Perceptions of
Palestine: Their Influence on U.S. Middle East Policy,
by Kathleen Christison, University of California
Press
"Since [President Woodrow] Wilson's time American public opinion
has been formed and policy has been made from a vantage point or frame
of reference that is primarily centered on Israel and tends to ignore
the Palestinian perspective. Th[is online] book traces trends in public
thinking over the decades an the impact this thinking has had on each
administration up to the present."
A
Crime Against the Innocent, by Gideon Levy, Ha'aretz,
January 14, 2002
"The punitive action executed by Israel at the weekend in the Gaza
Strip, and in particular the mass demolition of homes in Rafah on Thursday
morning, constitute a war crime. There is no other way to describe and
define the collective punishment of hundreds of innocent civilians who
have been left utterly destitute. Under the cover of the media blackout
in Israel - it is very difficult to get to the southern Gaza Strip -
bulldozers of the Israel Defense Forces turned 'homes into a wasteland,'
as M., a Rafah resident, said by phone. If there was a time when at
least part of Israeli public opinion was in an uproar over the demolition
of the home of a terrorist's family, and there was a public debate over
the justice of the act, now Israel is demolishing the homes of hundreds
of residents who don't even have a family connection to terrorism -
and hardly anyone says a word in protest. Can we, the Israelis, even
begin to imagine what it feels like to have bulldozers suddenly appear
in the middle of the night and plow under everything a family has, as
they and their children watch? Did the decision makers take into account
the hatred they are sowing in the hearts of the children who witnessed
the destruction of their homes? And what will become of these wretched
people now, people who even before their homes were razed were doomed
to a sordid life in one of the poorest of the refugee camps? Where are
they going to spend the bitterly cold nights? And what was their sin?
True, Rafah is a bastion of the Hamas organization, a place where the
Palestinian Authority wields little influence; but does that justify
the decision to launch war against every person in the city?"
Israel
Is a Very Costly Ally, by Charley Reese,
Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,
October 2001
"America’s blind support of Israel’s gross violations of human
rights and international law will not only cost billions of tax dollars
but eventually American lives as well. No lobby for any foreign country
should be allowed to jeopardize American interests and American lives
just to serve the selfish interests of a foreign power. America’s government
has only one justification for existence—to protect the lives and interests
of Americans. It’s time to start asking Americans, including our elected
officials: Which country are you loyal to?"
Police
Beat Dozens of Palestinians Staying Illegally in Jaffa,
Ha'aretz, January 15, 2002
"Border Policemen abused approximately 60 Palestinians Sunday night
in Jaffa, Israel Radio reported. The Palestinians were arrested for
staying in Israel without permits. The radio reported that Border Policemen
came to a house in Jaffa where the Palestinians stayed in order to arrest
them. Immediately following the arrest, one of the policemen kicked
a Palestinian and injured him. The Palestinians were taken to a bus
that took them to Kafr Qasem in the Sharon region, where the Palestinians
were released. On the bus the men were tied in pairs with their faces
on the floor. The policemen hit them with sticks. If one of them raised
his head, he was severely beaten. Palestinian sources said Monday that
28 residents of the West Bank town of Qalqilyah were hospitalized in
the town's hospital after Border Policemen beat them."
Want
Security? End the Occupation, Washington Post,
January 16, 2002
"Israel's assassination of Fatah activist Raed Karmi on Monday
was predictable. Despite Israel's having killed more than 18 Palestinians
since President Yasser Arafat's call for a cease-fire on Dec. 18, there
have been no Israeli civilian casualties during that time. That, according
to world governments and the international press, constituted a 'lull
in the violence.' But a lull in the violence is exactly what Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon cannot afford. He was elected in a time
of crisis and knows that his rule is sustainable only in a time of crisis.
For his own political survival, he will do whatever it takes, and look
for any excuse, to stoke the flames of unrest and avoid a return to
peace negotiations. Hence, more than 600 Palestinians, already refugees,
were recently made refugees yet again as Sharon's bulldozers razed their
homes in Gaza. A day later Palestinian homes in occupied East Jerusalem
were destroyed. And then, just to ensure that Palestinians are sufficiently
provoked and the cycle of violence starts again, Israel assassinates
Karmi. Sharon justifies such barbaric and illegal measures in the name
of 'security.' But as someone often considered a candidate for Israeli
assassination myself, I can assure the Israeli people that neither my
assassination nor any of the other 82 assassinations during the past
15 months will bring them any closer to the security they seek and deserve."
Excerpts
from Alfred Lilienthal's book, The Zionist Connection II, cyberone.com
(selected by Peter Myers), 1983
"One-sided reportage on terrorism, in which cause was never related
to effect, was assured because the most effective component of the Jewish
connection is probably that of media control. It is well {p. 219} known
that American public opinion molders have long been largely influenceed
by a handful of powerful newspapers, including the New York Times,
the Washington Post, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch -
owned respectively by the Sulzbergers, Eugene Meyer and
now his daughter Katharine Graham (half-Jewish, who also owns
Newsweek), and the Pulitzers, a Hungarian Jewish family.
The New York Post, until recently when it was sold to Rupert
Murdoch, was in the capable hands of Dorothy Schiff, the granddaughter
of banker Jacob Schiff. ... Other newspapers, not Jewish-owned,
have top editors, directors, and advertising chiefs who are Jewish,
such as the Los Angeles Times and the International Herald
Tribune, an amalgam of the New York Times, the Washington
Post, and the old New York Herald Tnbune. In 1978 the Washington
Star's owner was Time Magazine and the publisher until June
1 was Joe L. Allbritton, but the views of the executive editor Sidney
Epstein and associate editor Edwin Yoder, Jr. were clearly
ref1ected in its editorials and articles during the critical Middle
East developments. All of the leading magazines, ranging trom Commentary,
Esquire, Ladies Home Journal, New York Review of Books,
New Yorker, and U.S. News and World Report, have
Jews in key positions as publishers, editors, or managing editors. These
people, at the very least, have the veto power over whatatever appears
in their publications. No one is about to criticize Jews - or even take
Israel to task - for fear of being out of line with the boss, who is
likely to fire him. The boss himself may not be a screaming Zionist,
but scarcely ever will walk out of step with the overwhelming articulated
opinion by expressing his own views on this subject, which in turn makes
his Christian friends and contacts keep whatever criticism they may
harbor under full wraps. There is also the constant overriding concern
of the media about losing advertising, so vital to every publication,
at times making a mockery of the vaunted 'freedom ot press.' Power is
thus very otten exercised by default. ... {p. 220} It would be futile
to list the number of top Jewish editors and writers across the courltry.
Many of the largest book publishers, including Knopf, Random
House, Holt, Liverwright, Viking Press, Simon
and Schuster, Van Nostrand Reinhold, and Lyle Stewart
are Jewish-owned, directly or by Jewish-controlled interests (including
CBS, RCA, Music Corporation of America, Litton's, and Gulf and Western).
In other firms such as Macmillan and Grosset & Dunlap, one will find
editors-in-chief or presidents who are Jewish. ... In radio and television,
again one finds almost an overwhelming presence of key Jews. Chairman
of the Board of CBS until very recently was William Paley: RCA's
David and Robert Sarnoff for a long time ran their subsidiary,
the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) whose {p. 221} present chairman
is Julian Goodman; and Leonard Goldenson headed the American
Broadcasting Company (ABC) until succeeded by Fred Silverman.
... A few officials in three offices all located on the east side of
Sixth Avenue in Manhattan between 49th and 54th streets select most
of the ideas, experiences, and news reaching most of the American people.
... Virtually all national and international news is filtered, edited,
and broadcast by these three corporations."
Israeli-Russian
Journalist Calls for Castration as Anti-Terror Step,
Haaretz, January 19, 2002
"An article calling for the castration of Israeli Arabs as a means
of fighting terrorism was published last week in the leading Israeli-Russian
daily Novosti. The article, called 'How To Force Them To Leave]
and written by Marian Belenki, one of the paper's prominent journalists,
said that the threat of castration may be strong enough to encourage
the Arabs to leave the country. The author also proposed that the Chinese
method for lowering birth rates be implemented in Israel for the Arab
population in order to lower their birth rates. According to this method,
people who have more than one child are deprived of various benefits,
lose their jobs, and are under threat of exile. Cash prizes for young
men who voluntarily agree to the castration will also be provided, according
to the proposed method ... [W]hat is even more surprising than the fact
that the piece got published, is that the paper did not receive any
responses from readers or public representatives of the Russian community.
It should be noted that the paper is one of two leading dailies of the
Russian community in Israel."
Making Up for the Past, Churches Give Check to British Zionists,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), January
18, 2002
"Churches in the city of Derby have paid the Zionist Federation
$4,300 after renouncing a 700-year-old charter that barred 'any Jew
or Jewess from ever living' in the city. Rev. Geoff Pickup of the New
Life Christian Centre in Derby, in central England, wrote to the Zionist
Federation offices explaining the decision. 'Seven hundred years ago
the burgesses of Derby paid the king ten marks, equivalent to almost'
$4,300 today, 'for a charter to exclude any Jew or Jewess from ever
living or being remembered in Derby,' Pickup wrote. 'We feel we have
now cut off the injustice of 700 years with much prayer and repentance,'
the letter said. 'We now feel as a token of our respect and to bring
a closure motion on the past that we would like to give the equivalent
amount of money to a Jewish cause. I hope you will accept this gift
with our love, apologies, honours and prayers.' The churches then presented
the Zionist Federation with a check equal to $4,300. 'We are stunned
and delighted at this fantastic gesture, and the donation will be put
to good use, going to one of our charities in Israel,' said Alan
Aziz, executive director of the Zionist Federation."
At
Gaza's Grimmest Camp Bulldozers Make It Worse,
Philadelphia Inquirer, January 19, 2002
"Block O. Rafah Camp. Even the name sounds like a prison. "It's
not a life. It's a hell. . . . 'No place in Rafah is safe,' says unemployed
construction worker Omar Abu Shawish, 34. He lived for 30 years in the
Block O section of this densely packed Palestinian refugee camp before
Israeli army bulldozers knocked down his house two months ago. Now Shawish
lives a few streets away with his wife and 10 children in one room at
his brother-in-law's house. Last week, after a Palestinian commando
attack on a military post left four Israeli soldiers dead, Israeli armor
and bulldozers rumbled through Rafah again, pursuing a policy of house
demolitions that has triggered debate well beyond the 80,000 people
who live here. The army says it demolished 21 houses inside the Gaza
fence opposite its Termit military outpost, a remote, bullet-pocked,
three-story structure under daily Palestinian attack. The destroyed
houses, the army contends, had been empty for months and were being
used as Palestinian sniper positions and to mask construction of tunnels
used to smuggle arms from Egypt into the Rafah camp. The Palestinian
Authority contends 73 houses were destroyed in last week's operation,
casting hundreds of people into the street. The United Nations and the
Red Cross say 54 houses occupied by 80 families, totaling 450 people,
were pounded into rubble on a sandy, partially paved expanse the size
of two football fields. A recent visit found children picking through
the wreckage for belongings buried under mounds of broken concrete blocks
... Critics of the demolition operation call it a shameful chapter in
Israeli military history: collective punishment of civilians for the
deadly acts of a militant few."
Action
Alert: For NPR [National Public Radio] Violence Is Calm If It's Violence
Against Palestinians, FAIR (Fairness
and Accuracy in Reporting,
January 10, 2002
"Before the January 9 gun battle on the Gaza Strip, National
Public Radio (NPR) had for weeks been telling its listeners that
Israel/Palestine was in a period of 'relative quiet.' 'Morning Edition'
anchor Bob Edwards on January 3 stated that U.S. envoy Anthony Zinni
was coming to the region during 'a time of comparative quiet.' In another
report the same day, correspondent Linda Gradstein referred to
'the relative calm of the past few weeks.' Other NPR reports have mentioned
the 'recent calm' (1/5/02) or the 'fragile period of quiet' (1/7/02).
What NPR means by this was spelled out most explicitly by Linda Gradstein
in a January 4 report on the envoy’s mission. 'You know, there's been
actually three weeks of relative quiet,' she said. 'Only one Israeli
has been killed in those three weeks, as opposed to 44 Israelis who
were killed when Zinni was here last time in November and early December.'
What Gradstein didn’t mention-- and what someone who relied on
NPR for their Middle Eastern news would have little idea of -- was that
this has been in no way a period of calm for Palestinians. In fact,
in the three-week period that Gradstein referred to, at least
26 Palestinians were killed by occupation forces-- more than one a day.
Media critic Ali Abunimah documented the killings in a letter of protest
to NPR (1/8/02), starting with 13-year-old Rami Khamis Al-Zorob, shot
in the head on December 13 while playing near his home in Rafah, Gaza.
Most of the deaths cited by Abunimah were of unarmed civilians; six
were minors, ranging in age from 12 to 17. But none of these deaths
received much attention from NPR, leaving the impression that calm for
Israelis was calm for Palestinians as well."
Abed
Takoush -- Our Tower of Strength, BBC News,
May 25, 2000
"I've just been to the funeral of my friend Abed Takoush. He was
killed at about midday on Tuesday, 24 May by an Israeli shell. Abed
loved news and in the end he died for it He was sitting in his car,
phoning his family when an Israeli tank crew decided he was a target
worth destroying. Abed had worked for the BBC in Beirut for 25 years
and between times he helped hundreds of other journalists. He's being
mourned in Lebanon and around the world. Abed loved his work, he loved
the scent of a story, he loved news and in the end he died for it."
Our
Violent Society, Jerusalem Post, January
18, 2002
"In a recent interview in Yediot Aharonot, Prof. Bernard Lewis,
the world-renowned doyen of Middle Eastern studies, described Israelis
as being the most impolite people in the world. That description could
be termed an understatement. I recently took part in a conference in
which the participants came from 14 different countries. None of them
dreamed of interrupting each other, none, that is, except the Israelis,
some of whom evidently thought the accepted mode of debate is the one
practiced in Dan Margalit's or Nissim Mishal's TV talk shows,
in which participants have to shout each other down in order to be heard
... There is no need to belabor the point, especially not in The Jerusalem
Post, many of whose readers came from 'Anglo-Saxon' countries and who
suffer daily from the impolite behavior of so many Israelis. Rudeness,
however, is only one of the maladies which afflict our society. Violence
is far graver - violence in our schools, on the streets and roads, husbands
against wives, fathers against sons and daughters, neighbors, in bars
and pubs. Violence has become part of our daily lives. Not a day passes
without some lurid story in the media, more testimony of the savagery
we regularly inflict on each other. The situation in the schools is
particularly disturbing, for violent behavior is becoming entrenched
as a way of life for many of our children. Something evidently is very
wrong with our society. Lack of manners, rudeness, hot tempers, impatience,
aggressive attitudes, and violence have become hallmarks of our behavior
to each other, and the symptoms are getting worse by the day ... What,
then, has happened to us? Why have the ugly features of our society
become so predominant? ... We have become war weary, a people which
does not see a way out of the spiral of ever-increasing hostility that
so characterizes our relations with our neighbors. That hostility, and
the attitudes and deeds it creates in our dealings with them, impacts
on what is happening in our own society. It cannot be otherwise. It
affects our soldiers and the families of our soldiers, it affects our
politicians, it affects us all."
Clinton: Don't Give Up Hope for Peace, Jerusalem
Post, January 21, 2002
"[Former President Bill] Clinton was here [in Israel] to receive
the honorary doctorate [from Tel Aviv University] in recognition of
his contribution to peace efforts in the world and the Middle East in
particular. Local political, business, and academic leaders gave him
an enthusiastic welcome ... Among those who came to celebrate with him
was former US ambassador Martin Indyk, who served during the
Clinton and Bush administrations. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
described Clinton as 'an honorable leader and true friend of Israel,'
and said his unwavering commitment to the Jewish people and steadfast
partnership with Israel are valued. 'You have captured the hearts of
us all,' he said. TAU President Itamar Rabinovich said there
are two Hebrew words for 'friend.' One is haver, to which Clinton gave
new poignancy when he eulogized Yitzhak Rabin, and the other
is yedid, the name that was given in pre-state days to Orde Wingate,
who was known as Hayedid - the friend. As far as Israel's contemporary
friends go, said Rabinovich, Clinton is also Hayedid."
EU
Blames Israel for $12.8 Million in Damages to Projects in PA [Palestinian
Authority], Haaretz, January 22, 2002
"The European Union said Tuesday that Israel has wrought damage
worth 14.5 million euros ($12.8 million) to Palestinian projects funded
by European Union taxpayers in the last year. That figure did not include
the destruction of the Voice of Palestine radio station in Ramallah
by Israeli helicopter gunships last weekend, said Gunnar Wiegand, spokesman
for the EU's European Commission. Wiegand told a briefing that the 15-nation
Union would decide in the next few days on a diplomatic response. The
European Union is the main foreign aid donor to the Palestinian Authority.
'There has been substantial damage to buildings and other infrastructure
that were financed by the European taxpayer. There are funds from the
Commission and from the member states that have been spent on these
projects,' he said ... EU officials said the decision to make a public
issue of the damage to EU-funded projects was itself a political message
but did not necessarily foreshadow stronger action against Israel."
As
War Cries Ring Out, U.S. Silence May Signal Rare Free Hand for Israeli
Military Moves, Haaretz, January 24,
2002
With talk of all-out war resounding in the Holy Land, the Bush administration
has granted Israel its widest military freedom of action since - in
an ominous precedent - a Republican administration turned a blind eye
to Ariel Sharon's 1982 invasion of Lebanon. Hardliners on both sides
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have issued repeated calls to turn
a runaway spiral of escalation into full-bore military conflict. Although
their war cries have often been been sounded in the past, Washington's
tacit approval of recent IDF military moves, coupled with its continuing
pressure on Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to crack down on militants
in his midst, represents a marked departure from nearly two decades
of nominal American even-handedness toward the battling sides. Even
U.S. diplomats whom Israeli hawks have viewed with suspicion as overly
balanced toward the Palestinians, have weighed in on the side of non-intervention
with IDF operations ... A decidedly pro-Israel tone among U.S.elected
officials has become more evident as November Congressional elections
near. In an unprecendented circumstance - and in the face of security
threats - there have been no fewer than nine U.S. Congressional delegations
visiting Israel in the last two weeks. Most, vowing support for Israel,
snubbed Arafat altogether. In the highest-profile visit of an American
dignitary, former president Bill Clinton embraced Sharon, openly telling
his Israeli hosts that the Palestinian leader was to blame for the failure
of what Clinton called the 'golden opportunity' for peace that the previous
Israeli government had offered him at the ill-fated July, 2000 Camp
David summit At present, the only substantial pressure being applied
on the Bush administration from domestic constituencies is coming from
pro-Israel figures, Eldar says. U.S. officials have said privately that
the American Jewish community has taken administration officials to
task for maintaining channels of communication with Arafat and his deputies."
Ex-Militia
Chief Slain Beirut, Los Angeles Times,
January 25, 2001
"A former Lebanese militia leader linked to the massacre of hundreds
of Palestinian refugees in 1982 was killed in a car bombing in Beirut
on Thursday, leaving behind a trail of enemies and a long list of possible
suspects--including an allegation that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon was behind the hit. Elie Hobeika, 45, former leader of the
Christian militia known as the Lebanese Forces, allied himself with
Israel after it invaded southern Lebanon in the early 1980s and then
switched allegiances to Syria a few years later when that regime in
effect took control of his war-racked country. The notorious militia
leader, whose maneuvering won him positions in the Lebanese government,
died in an explosion that also killed three bodyguards. Investigators
said 22 pounds of TNT packed in a nearby car was detonated by remote
control. Fingers were pointed at Syria, Israel and inside Lebanon itself.
Some on the streets of Beirut said they hoped that Israel was behind
the attacks--if it wasn't, they said, they fear a return to the kind
of home-grown violence that fueled a devastating 15-year civil war.
Even as investigators were poring over the debris, the Lebanese government
pointed to Israel and Sharon. Officials, including Syrian-backed President
Emile Lahoud, suggested that Hobeika was silenced to stop him from testifying
against Sharon at a possible war crimes trial in Belgium. Although it
was Hobeika's militia that massacred the unarmed Palestinians in the
Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in 1982, then-Israeli Defense Minister
Sharon was forced to resign because his troops were encircling the area
during the attack. An Israeli commission found that Sharon shouldered
at least indirect blame for the bloodletting. 'We have a confirmation
that Israel and its agents were behind this terrorist act,' Lebanese
Interior Minister Elias Murr said at a news conference late Thursday,
though he did not provide any evidence."
Some
Israeli Reservists Balk,
Newsday (from Associated Press), January
25, 2002
"Fifty-two Israeli reserve soldiers said Friday they would no longer
fight in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, claiming military actions there
had nothing to do with security for Israel and were meant to control
the Palestinians. In an advertisement in Israeli newspapers, the soldiers,
some with the rank of major, said Israel's stringent travel bans, which
confine many Palestinians to their communities, needlessly punish the
Palestinians. Israel says the closures are needed to prevent attacks
by Palestinian militants. 'We declare that we will not continue to fight
a war for peace in the (Jewish) settlements' in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, read the ad. 'We will not continue to fight on the other side
of the Green Line with an intent to control, expel, starve and degrade
an entire people.' The Green Line refers to the line separating Israel
from the territories it captured in the 1967 Mideast war. The soldiers
wrote that they decided to stop serving in the Palestinian areas when
it became clear to them that the army orders 'had nothing to do with
security, and their only intent is to control the Palestinian people
forever.'"
Forget
Peace If the Rules Differ for Israel, Japan
Times, January 24, 2002
"Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's decision to keep
Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat under siege in the West
Bank city of Ramallah shows an utter disrespect for the Palestinian
leader and for the Palestinians. While Sharon insists that Arafat will
not leave the city until the assassins of Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam
Zeevi are apprehended, those in Israel responsible for assassinating
scores of Palestinian leaders in state-sponsored terrorism go free,
with no Israeli commitment to capture and punish them ... U.S. Secretary
of State Colin Powell backed Israel's demands that Arafat arrest and
try those responsible for trying to smuggle weapons aboard the vessel
in the Red Sea, adding that the arms shipment was a violation of the
Oslo accords of 1993. But so is Israel's continuing building of settlements,
the assassination of Palestinian leaders and the attacks against the
civilian population. Why is it OK for Israel to continue to receive
U.S. arms to assassinate Palestinians, but not OK for the Palestinians
to defend themselves? ... Israeli reprisals have been brutal and indiscriminate,
involving civilian non-combatants, women and children."
Napoleon at the Gates of Ramallah, Gush Shalom,
January 26, 2002
"In pursuing this historic mission [Israeli Prime Minister Ariel]
Sharon is ruthless and merciless. Rivers of blood do not deter
him, the number of casualties (theirs and ours) is just one item in
his calculations. He acts cautiously, uses ruses and does not shrink
from committing war crimes. He knows that he does not have much time
left, and that he must use the remaining time in order to destroy the
Palestinian people as a political factor. To achieve this, he has to
break thir leadership, defeat their armed forces, smash their will and
ability to resist. What is the final aim? The minimum: To imprison the
Palestinians in several enclaves, each one cut off from the others and
from the world at large, each one surrounded by settlements, by-pass
roads and the army. In these big prison camps, the Palestinians will
be allowed to 'manage their own affaires,' supplying cheap labor and
a captive market. He does not care if they are called 'a Palestinian
state.' The maximum: To exploit a war situation or a world crisis to
expel all Palestinians (including those who are Israeli citizens) from
the country. Sharon is quite capable of instigating a war to create
such an opportunity. He has only contempt for the people around him,
who are unable to think in such historic terms."
Split
Widens Over Israeli Reservists, BBC News,
February 1, 2002
"A decision by more than 100 Israeli reserve officers to refuse
to serve in the Palestinian territories has sparked a furious row inside
the military, and a widening public debate. In the biggest challenge
to the army's authority since the Palestinian uprising began 16 months
ago, the reservists have said they are not willing to fight for the
purpose of 'dominating, expelling, starving and humiliating an entire
people.' This in turn has prompted a strong counter campaign, and a
suggestion by the army's chief of staff that there are political motives
behind the protest, which would amount to incitement to rebellion. A
former head of Israel's internal security service, Ami Ayalon,
has given his support to their protest, saying he is very concerned
about the large number of unarmed Palestinian children shot by Israeli
troops."
Rightist
Ex-Generals Propose Massive Invasion of Territories,
Haaretz, January
31, 2002
"A group of senior reserve officers, led by Brig. Gen. (res.) Effi
Eitam (Fein) are working on a 'security-political plan' that
includes reoccupying the territories to destroy the Palestinian Authority
and changing the political system to prevent Arabs from being elected
to the Knesset. Former reserve generals and senior defense establishment
officials are taking part in the formulations of the plan. Eitam, who
left the army a year ago and makes no secret of his right wing views,
has been conducting intensive political activity in recent months. Beyond
the plan's military recommendations are Eitam's plans to directly enter
the political arena, possibly as part of a new right wing movement.
The plan has already been presented to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon,
who refrained from expressing support for it, and is due to be presented
to the public in the coming weeks ... The plan calls for a massive Israeli
invasion of Palestinian cities. The former generals argue that the military
incursions into cities like Jenin and Tul Karm proved in recent weeks
that the IDF would have no problem taking over the cities. They propose
entering the territories, 'cleaning' them of terrorists and weapons,
and then ruling the areas. The move would include the elimination of
the Palestinian Authority. Some also call for the physical elimination
of Yasser Arafat. According to the ex-generals, the strategic reality
could be changed 'in a week.' The former generals say they have support
for their plan in the top command of the IDF ... The plan also recommends
taking far-reaching steps in other areas: An aggressive Israeli military
approach to the nuclear threat from Iran (if the U.S. doesn't do it)
... The plan recommends changing the electoral system to a district
system, with the districts gerrymandered to prevent significant Israeli
Arab representation in the Knesset. The main criteria, they believe,
is whatever strengthens Israel as a Jewish state. They say they hope
to win broad support for their goals in the Israeli public, and that
they believe the Americans would acquiesce to their plans. They say
the circumstances may be such that the current administration in Washington
would not object to these proposed Israeli steps."
Zionism in the Age of Dictators. A Reappraisal, by Lenni Brenner,
1983
Lenni Brenner's complete book critique of Zionism online.
US
Court Awards $183m. to Jerusalem Bombing Victim's Family,
Jerusalem Post, February 8, 2002
"The US District Court for the District of Columbia yesterday awarded
$33 million in direct damages and $150m. in punitive damages to the
family of Ira Weinstein, an American-Israeli killed in the terrorist
suicide bombing of a No. 18 bus in Jerusalem on February 25, 1996. Weinstein's
wife, Susan, and his children, Joseph, Jennifer Weinstein
Hazim, and David Weinstein sued Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamemei,
then-president Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, and Ali Fallahian-Kuzestani and
the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security as having financed
Hamas and trained Hassan Salameh, who planned the attack. According
to attorney Nitzana Darshan-Leitner, who represented the Jerusalem-based
family in Israel, this is the highest settlement granted to a US terror
victim since passage of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty
Act of 1996. The act enables US citizens who have been victims of a
state-supported terrorist attack abroad to sue the perpetrators in a
US federal court."
Israeli
Reserves Just Say No, ABC News, February
8, 2002
"It's not the first time Israeli soldiers have refused to serve
in the volatile territories, but never so many soldiers at once…and
never such damaging allegations against their commanders. The petition
started with 50 reserve officers and soldiers. Since it appeared in
Israeli newspapers two weeks ago, about another 150 have signed it ...
David Zonshein served in Gaza and expressed concerns over what
he said were orders on how to deal with Palestinian ambulances when
they approached an Israeli military checkpoint. 'You don't let the ambulance
past. Every time one arrives you stop the entire section using APCs
[Armored Personnel Carriers] and tanks. It can take an hour or more
to check the ambulance. It doesn't matter how many people are inside
it or if the sirens are blasting. The soldier has no choice,' said Zonshein,
a paratrooper reservist ... 'When faced with a demonstration we were
told to bring in the snipers immediately. Shoot three or four of the
organizers, not to let the event get out of hand because then we would
have to shoot women and children and that doesn't look good in the media,'
Zonshein said. 'The rules of engagement in the first two weeks [of my
service] were clear: anyone who picks up a stone, shoot him. Period,"
said Ishai Shagi, an artillery reservist ... There have been
three Palestinian suicide attacks in the last two weeks, but the Israeli
reservists say the army's aggressive responses will only ensure more
attacks to come. Reservist Yaniv Itzkovitch described watching
army bulldozers destroy Palestinian homes and olive groves. 'And so
you ask yourself after seeing such a thing if there's one Palestinian
left who does not hate us, he is going to start hating us. But the army
says it's necessary for security. It's outrageous,' Itzkovitch said
... 'In 10 or 20 years this country will look back and ask, 'What did
we do? What did we perpetrate? What happened here in Israel?' another
reservist said."
Giuliani
Gets Award as Friend of Israel, Miami Herald,
February 11, 2002
"Before Sept. 11, he was merely a man who was mayor. After the
day that changed a nation, Rudolph Giuliani became the country's mayor,
everyone's hero and Mr. Patriot -- even Time magazine's Person
of the Year. On Sunday, one more title was bestowed upon him, officially,
at the Greater Miami Jewish Federation's campaign opening dinner: ally.
The group honored Giuliani with the Friend of Israel Humanitarian Award
for his leadership after the terrorist attacks. Nearly 90 minutes late,
Giuliani made his way through the pressing crowd before discussing post-Sept.
11 security measures, the war on terrorism and America's ties to Israel.
'There is a very very strong connection between Israel and the United
States that's even deeper than the blood lines,' he said. 'The actual
strength and depth of our connection is very simple: We're democracies.'''
Everybody
Hates, Jerusalem Post, October 22,
2000
"Dr. Dahlia Moore, from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem
and the College of Management, has recently published the results of
a study among nearly 5,000 Jewish and 1,200 Israeli Arab high school
students, age 15-18. Put simply, the study sought to find out 'who likes
whom and who hates whom' within Israeli society. Summing up her results,
Moore says, 'These students, the future of our society, carry a tremendous
amount of hatred towards each other' ... Overall, 47% of the Jewish
students hate haredim, 51% hate settlers and 50% hate Arabs. When Moore
sub-divided the Jewish group according to ethnic (Ashkenazi or Mizrahi),
religious (religious-traditional or secular), and political (Left or
Right) backgrounds, the findings became more complicated and more troubling
... 'The kind of hatred that we found in our study simply doesn't dissipate
over a few years ... The point is that this should be a warning to our
society. These kids hate, and with such depths of hatred, our society
is in deep trouble. When you hate someone because they are different
from you, you might also start to think that this person is somehow
less worthy, less entitled to the same rights and privileges, less human'
... Nissim Calderon, Tel Aviv University lecturer and author
of the recently published, Multi-culturalism vs. Pluralism in Israel,
[said:} 'It's come to the point that hating is almost the only way to
relate to people you don't agree with. And that is very sad, and very,
very frightening.'"
Escaping the
Hell of the Holy Land, Village Voice,
February 13-19, 2002
"Many Israelis are 'preoccupied with a subject no one likes to
talk about . . . ways to get the hell out of here,' columnist Yoel
Marcus wrote in Ha'Aretz the other day. It's true. Ask Tali.
Increasingly anxious about their children's security, tired of paying
exorbitant taxes to support what they consider 'religious parasites,'
and pessimistic about the future, a growing number of young Israeli
professionals are looking at the possibility of leaving the country.
For good. And Israelis aren't the only ones—more and more Palestinians
want out, too. Some 20 percent of adult Israelis say they have recently
considered living in a different country, according to a January poll
conducted by Market Watch for Ma'ariv newspaper. More surprising,
the survey found that 12 percent of Israeli parents would like their
children to grow up outside Israel. An earlier poll by the Mutagim Agency
for Ha'Aretz said only 37 percent of Israelis held negative feelings
toward those who left, and 16 percent actually viewed them positively.
Those are startling statistics in a country where the late Prime Minister
Yitzhak Rabin once described emigrants as the 'lowliest of parasites'
... .No one knows how many Israelis are in the diaspora, but two years
ago it was estimated that there were 500,000 of them, or 8.3 percent
of the Israeli population. It has to be more now. The daily Yedioth
Aharonot recently ticked off a list of prominent Israeli families
who have children or grandchildren living abroad. The list included
the families of former Israeli prime ministers David Ben-Gurion,
Menachem Begin, and Yitzhak Rabin. Israelis were shocked
... 'I heard lots of people want to go to Vanuatu [an island in the
South Pacific],' Tali said. 'But I would never go to a place
where there were so many Israelis!'"
American
Jewish Groups Bringing Mostly Unified Message to Israel,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), February
19, 2002
"American Jewish organizational leaders headed for Israel this
week with an unusually unified message. Ideological divisions still
exist among American Jews, who like Israelis, have divided views about
the best way to end the violence. But given the daily fire between Israel
and the Palestinians, the Conference of Presidents of American Jewish
Organizations — the coordinating body of 52 national American Jewish
organizations — is rallying to Israel´s defense."
Ministry
Funds Rabbi Who Lauds Goldstein,
Haaretz, February 2002
"The Religious Affairs Ministry is financing the Gal Eini
association that distributes the writings of Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg,
the author of the pamphlet 'Baruch Hagever' (a play on words that can
be translated as 'Baruch the Man,' or as 'The Blessed Man'). The pamphlet
praises the massacre carried out in 1994 by Baruch Goldstein,
who killed 29 Muslim worshipers at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron.
Ginsburg declared that Goldstein's deed constitutes 'a fulfillment of
a number of commandments of Jewish law...[including] taking revenge
on non-Jews.'"
Europe
Must Stop Parroting the American Script, by Robert Fisk,
Independent (UK), February 21, 2002
"As Palestinians are learning from their Hizbollah compatriots
in Lebanon how to resist an occupying force – how to obtain 'freedom'
– Mr Bush continues to give the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
a green light to 'strike against terror' while at the same time demanding
democracy for all Muslim countries in the Middle East, especially Iran
and Iraq. But not, of course, for allies like Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
The ability of the Americans to re-write history and to blow-dry the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict into clichés is a scandal. The occupied
Palestinian territories have now become the 'disputed' territories;
Jewish colonies on Arab land have become 'settlements' and now, according
to the BBC and CNN, 'neighbourhoods.' Israeli death squads are now 'elite
forces' who carry out 'targeted killings' ... The Palestinian Intifada
uprising, provoked by Ariel Sharon's visit to the Al-Aqsa mosque,
is a 'strategic error,' according to the State Department on Tuesday.
An Israeli officer tells his colleagues, according to the Israeli daily
newspaper Ha'aretz, that they must 'study how the German Army
operated in the Warsaw Ghetto.' Needless to say the latter report is
not published in the United States."
Linda Gradstein
Should Resign Her Post as NPR's Israel Correspondent,
Palestine Media Watch, February 20, 2002
"According to research done by ElectronicIntifada (also see text
below, after the interface), Linda Gradstein, the Israel correspondent
for National Public Radio since 1990, has been a regular PAID speaker
within pro-Zionist Hillel groups for several years. This is in clear
violation of NPR's explicit policy, as stated on the air by Juan Williams
on a Feb 8, 2002 report on Morning Edition, in which he said:
'At NPR, reporters are not allowed to give speeches to groups they report
on to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest.' But as recently
as yesterday, and in spite of numerous vociferous protests of indignation
(PMWatch counted at least 150 letters sent on February 19 alone),
Ms. Gradstein still went ahead and gave a lecture hosted by several
pro-Israel organizations at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis
... Ms. Gradstein has been giving PAID talks to openly pro-Zionist
groups on a regular basis for at least five years WHILE at the same
time working for NPR as the main point person at their Jerusalem bureau.
This constitutes a blatant breach of journalistic ethics, especially
when the topic of the reporting is the highly sensitive Palestinian-Israeli
conflict."
Sen.
Clinton Reassures Israel, Washington Post,
February 23, 2002
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Saturday that U.S. support for
Israel was rock solid and blamed 17 months of Palestinian-Israeli bloodshed
on Yasser Arafat, saying 'he has failed as a leader' ... The junior
Democratic senator from New York, on the first day of a two-day visit
to Israel, urged other Americans to travel to the Holy Land as a show
of support for Israel and defiance against terrorism ... Clinton said
that following the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington, the
bonds between Israel and the United States are firmer than ever. The
United States and Israel stand together in 'resolve against those who
would try to undermine and destroy us,' she said. Clinton spoke after
Tourism Minister Benny Elon, and she was criticized for sharing
the podium with the ultranationalist politician who advocates expelling
Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Israeli opposition leader
Yossi Sarid said in a statement that it was unseemly for Clinton
to appear on the same stage as Elon."
True Lies about U.S. Aid to Israel,
Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,
December 1997
"For many years the American media said that 'Israel receives $1.8
billion in military aid' or that 'Israel receives $1.2 billion in economic
aid.' Both statements were true, but since they were never combined
to give us the complete total of annual U.S. aid to Israel, they also
were lies--true lies. Recently Americans have begun to read and hear
that 'Israel receives $3 billion in annual U.S. foreign aid.' That's
true. But it's still a lie. The problem is that in fiscal 1997 alone,
Israel received from a variety of other U.S. federal budgets at least
$525.8 million above and beyond its $3 billion from the foreign aid
budget, and yet another $2 billion in federal loan guarantees. So the
complete total of U.S. grants and loan guarantees to Israel for fiscal
1997 was $5,525,800,000. One can truthfully blame the mainstream media
for never digging out these figures for themselves, because none ever
have. They were compiled by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
But the mainstream media certainly are not alone. Although Congress
authorizes America's foreign aid total, the fact that more than a third
of it goes to a country smaller in both area and population than Hong
Kong probably never has been mentioned on the floor of the Senate or
House. Yet it's been going on for more than a generation. Probably the
only members of Congress who even suspect the full total of U.S. funds
received by Israel each year are the privileged few committee members
who actually mark it up. And almost all members of the concerned committees
are Jewish, have taken huge campaign donations orchestrated by Israel's
Washington, DC lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC),
or both."
Israel Center Scholar Shares
His Gripes About Native Land,
Jewish Bulletin, March 1, 2002
"It's common knowledge that most problems in Israel -- the environment,
the tax system, the high number of traffic accidents, to name a few
-- are often overlooked because of the existential issue of security.
Gil-Ad Harish has called it a 'bad excuse.' 'It doesn't work
anymore,' Harish said from his home in Tel Aviv. 'There are so many
issues that are f----d up that have nothing to do with the Arabs. It's
an abnormal country' ... The government wasn't formed the right way,
he charged, and therefore its ministers are receiving on-the-job training.
Not only that, but he called the government frozen and corrupt ... Yet
he didn't feel like he was exposing the country's dirty laundry; he
thinks most people agree with him. Besides, he said the book was for
Israelis only."
Hillary's
Visit Is 'Transfer' Pols Latest Coup,
[Jewish] Forward, March 1, 2002
"When Senator Hillary Clinton visited Israel last week, she didn't
pop by the Arafat compound, nor did she meet with leaders of Peace Now.
Instead, Mrs. Clinton, a New York Democrat, was the guest of Binyamin
Elon, the leader of the Moledet party, Israel's tourism minister
and a long-time advocate of 'transferring' the Palestinian population
out of the West Bank and Gaza. While the right-ward tilt of Mrs. Clinton's
brief Middle East swing is bound to be debated in the United States,
it is the increasing visibility of Mr. Elon that is raising eyebrows
in Israel. Indeed, Mr. Elon is seemingly everywhere of late — courted
by the media and honored by international leaders. Political observers
say his recent spate of public appearances is meant to popularize the
'transfer' concept. Thus far, he has succeeded in snapping up both national
support and international attention. Recent polls show that as many
as one in three Israelis supports the concept of the forced displacement
of Palestinians out of the West Bank and Gaza and into other Arab states.
Israel's leading Russian-language daily, Vesti, published a poll
indicating that 37% of Russian immigrants support this policy, while
35% of respondents to a poll conducted by the daily Ma'ariv said
they support transfer."
The
Tragic Reality of Israel, by A. N. Wilson, This
is London, March 2002
"In yesterday's Mail on Sunday, Gerald Kaufman, a Jew and
a lifelong Zionist wrote a courageous denunciation of present Israeli
policies. He said that, having visited Israel over 50 times, he never
intended to go back, so deep is his revulsion against Sharon's warmongering
...Those of us Gentiles who have seen ourselves as friends of Israel
over the years, have gradually watched any hope of a peaceful 'solution'
being destroyed by the policy of Israeli settlements in land that no
international lawyer believes to be theirs. This policy, if pursued
by any other nation on earth would be universally condemned and they
would be forced to withdraw. Until President Bush is prepared to put
American ground-troops into the disputed lands and force out the illegal
Jewish occupiers, then no one in the world is going to believe in American
foreign policy in the Muslim world. What greater act of 'terrorism'
can there be than [Israeli prime minister Ariel] Sharon's
policy of invasion, backed up by (American-made) tanks and bombs? Israel
is by definition an aggressor, since it is occupying land that was already
someone else's homeland."
Israel
and the U.S. A Unique Relationship, by James Petras,
CSCA Web, January 17, 2002
" Unlike Washington's relation with the EU, Japan and Oceana, it
is Israel which pressures and secures vast transfer of financial resources
($2.8 billion per year, $84 billion over 30 years). Israel secures the
latest arms and technology transfers, unrestrictive entry into U.S.
markets, free entry of immigrants, unconditional commitment of U.S.
support in case of war and repression of colonized people and guaranteed
U.S. vetoes against any UN resolutions. From the angle of inter-state
relations, it is the lesser regional power which exacts a tribute from
the Empire, a seeming unique or paradoxical outcome. The explanation
for this paradox is found in the powerful and influential role of pro-Israeli
Jews in strategic sectors of the U.S. economy, political parties, Congress
and Executive Branch. The closest equivalent to past empires is that
of influential white settlers in the colonies, who through their overseas
linkages were able to secure subsidies and special trading relations.
The Israeli 'colons' in the U.S. have invested and donated billions
of dollars to Israel, in some cases diverting funds from union dues
of low paid workers to purchase Israel bonds used to finance new colonial
settlements in the occupied territories. In other cases Jewish fugitives
from the U.S. justice system have been protected by the Israeli state,
especially super rich financial swindlers like Mark Rich and
even gangsters and murderers. Occasional official demands of extradition
from the U.S. Justice Department have been pointedly ignored. The colonized
Empire has gone out of its way to cover up its subservience to its supposed
ally, but in fact hegemonic power."
Israel
Sweep of Refugee Camps Goes On,
Los Angeles Times, March 2, 2002
On the second day of a major assault on two refugee camps, Israeli forces
pushed deeper into Balata, in the West Bank city of Nablus, and did
deadly battle with Palestinian fighters in the Jenin camp, about 25
miles to the north. One Israeli soldier and seven Palestinians--several
gunmen, an Islamic militant and one 10-year-old girl--were killed, taking
the two-day death toll to 22. By late in the day, the number of wounded
was about 200. The operations--which Israel says are designed to capture
Palestinian militants who have attacked Israelis--were widely condemned
by Israeli commentators as overly risky and ineffective. Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon's political support sank to a new low, dragged down
by a bloody conflict now in its 18th month that he has failed to stop.
For Palestinians, this cramped and miserable camp where refugees have
lived for the last 52 years has been an enduring symbol of resistance
and a crucible for almost every major Palestinian uprising, including
the first intifada against Israel in 1987-93 ... More than 20,000 people
live, practically on top of one another, in less than half a square
mile ... At the start of the incursion, Israeli forces cut electricity
and water to the camp. An army spokeswoman said the water was accidentally
cut when a bulldozer plowed through a water main. She said it would
be repaired. To carry out its house-to-house search, the army punched
holes in walls, allowing passage from structure to structure without
exposure to enemy fire. In some houses, soldiers entered through the
windows. In most cases, they herded the occupants into single rooms
while conducting the search, residents said."
Sarid:
Terror War to Last as Long as Occupation,
Jerusalem Post, March 4, 2002
"Opposition and [Israeli] Meretz leader MK Yossi Sarid said
yesterday in response to the attacks on Israelis on Saturday night and
yesterday morning that the 'terror wave would continue as long as the
occupation does.' Sarid said the public should be told the truth "even
during the craziest times." Efforts must be constantly made to end the
occupation and to set a secure border, he added. Sarid said no people
has ever accepted being occupied by a foreign power, and the Palestinian
people is no different."
State
Department Report: Israel's Human Rights Record 'Poor,'
Haaretz, March 5, 2002
"According to State Department figures, based on data collected
by the United States Embassy in Tel Aviv and its consulate in Jerusalem,
Israel killed 501 Palestinians in the course of 2001, most of them in
armed confrontations or violent demonstrations, but some of them in
other circumstances, which it described as 'sometimes excessive or indiscriminate
fire toward Palestinian civilian areas.' The report claims that Israel
has used live fire against Palestinian demonstrations, in violation
of the IDF's rules of engagement, and says that Israel's policy of bombing
Palestinian security facilities in response to terror attacks in its
territory led to the deaths of 93 Palestinians, most of them unarmed,
in the course of 2001. The report states that 68 Palestinians were killed
in 2001 during incursions into towns and villages in A areas, controlled
by the Palestinian Authority. With regard to targeted killings, the
report states that Israel targeted at least 33 Palestinians during the
course of the year and that 22 civilian bystanders, including four children,
were killed during these attacks. In recent months, Israel has launched
a diplomatic assault in an effort to persuade the Americans that the
assassination policy is indispensable."
Justice
Ministry: Belgium Won't Arrest PM for War Crimes,
Haaretz, March 7, 2002
"Prime Minister Ariel Sharon will be able to visit Belgium
without fearing that he will be arrested for war crimes, Irit Kahn,
the head of the international affairs department at the Justice Ministry,
said Wednesday. Speaking from the Belgian capital, Kahn told Ha'aretz
that the decision by a Brussels appeals court to delay a decision on
whether Belgium has the right to prosecute Sharon for alleged war crimes
was 'right and balanced.' The court decision, which reopened a debate
that Israel had believed closed, relates to a 1982 Beirut massacre of
Palestinian refugees."
The
Israeli Army Must Learn New Tactics Or Lose the War,
Telegraph (UK), March 7, 2002
"Professor [Martin] van Creveld, of the Hebrew University
of Jerusalem, is not only Israel's leading military historian. He is
also known around the staff colleges of the world, which he visits frequently
and where he is highly regarded. Creveld's voice carries weight ...
During the first intifada [the Israeli army: the Israel Defense Force]
was required to become a police force, which sapped its self-image as
a heroic fighting force. It performed that task quite successfully,
but now it is committed to reprisal missions, which often kill innocents
and do not advance the object of deterring terrorists from further atrocities.
Creveld goes as far as saying that the IDF is committing 'crimes.' It
is, he says, 'committing an endless series of crimes, day by day, night
by night, against the unarmed, against the young, against the pregnant.
Even when the Palestinians are armed, they are just poor fellows. Armies
collapse when they can no longer look themselves in the face.'"
Palestianian
Ambulance Workers Killed in West Bank,
Yahoo News (from Reuters), March 7, 2002
"Israeli troops killed two Palestinian ambulance workers on Thursday
when they shot at their vehicles in Tulkarm in the West Bank, Palestinian
hospital officials and witnesses said. Witnesses and hospital officials
said Tammam Salem, 38, was shot dead as his U.N. Relief and Works Agency
ambulance traveled through the Tulkram refugee camp, where Israeli troops
had seized positions and conducted house-to-house searches for suspected
militants. Ambulance driver Ibrahaim Assad was shot dead as he drove
his Palestinian Red Crescent vehicle in Tulkarm city, medics said. Nine
Palestinians, including the ambulance workers, have been killed in the
Tulkarm area in air attacks and fighting since the Israeli raid began
earlier in the day. Four other Palestinian ambulance workers were wounded
on Thursday when troops opened fire on their Palestinian Red Crescent
vehicle in Tulkarm in a third incident, hospital officials said."
Israeli
Bomb Hits School for 400 Blind Children,
Telegraph (UK), March 3, 2002
"Nearly 400 blind Palestinian children were left without a school
last night after an Israeli 1,000-lb bomb damaged the building. The
Rehabilitation Centre for the Visually Impaired, run by the United Nations
in Gaza City, was closed indefinitely after being partially destroyed
in Israeli bombing aimed at targets nearby on Tuesday night. The office
of General Abd al-Razzak al-Majayda, the head of the Palestinian security
forces for Gaza, was hit. Walls at the school collapsed and equipment
was critically damaged after a 1,000lb bomb was dropped by an American
made Israeli F-16 warplane, officials said."
Battle
for Palestine, Israel Shamir, March
9, 2002
"On March 3, a Palestinian Rob Roy armed with an old, WWII – vintage
carbine, succeeded to lay low the whole troop of heavily armed Jews.
One after another, he shot the soldiers, and their officers, and escaped
unharmed. In one stroke, he erased the overblown myth of Israeli military
valiance. Never again the supporters of Israel will sneer at Arab courage,
never again they will tell stories of shoes dropped in Sinai and Six
Day War. He repeated the feat of Karameh and returned the honour to
Palestinians. He also provided a healthy alternative to the morbid attraction
of suicide bombers, and not too early ... The marksman offered a different
route to glory, one that does not lead through the Valley of Death.
The full story of the Battle at Haramiyeh Pass should be sung by bards,
and taught by guerrilla fighters over the world. One against ten, the
Lone Ranger hit the most hated symbol of Jewish rule in Palestine, a
checkpost, where bored, overfed, sadistic Israeli soldiers daily humiliated,
beat and often murdered local people. Just a day before the battle,
the soldiers committed probably the most revolting and cowardly act
of cruelty. A Palestinian woman on her way to give birth came to the
checkpost, accompanied by her husband. The soldiers let her through
and then opened fire. Her husband was killed; the pregnant woman was
wounded and gave birth in the hospital. The soldiers were not reprimanded,
but the Army ‘expressed regrets’ to the survivors. Israeli Army’s main
concern is to keep the local population vulnerable and unable to defend
itself. Soldiers got used to kill unarmed civilians. Their preferred
victims are children; the weapon of choice is a long range high velocity
sharp-shooter rifle."
More
Israeli Jews Favor Transfer of Palestinians, Israeli Arabs-- Poll Finds,
Haaretz, March 12, 2002
"Some 46 percent of Israel's Jewish citizens favor transferring
Palestinians out of the territories, while 31 percent favor transferring
Israeli Arabs out of the country, according to the Jaffee Center for
Strategic Studies' annual national security public opinion poll. In
1991, 38 percent of Israel's Jewish population was in favor of transferring
the Palestinians out of the territories while 24 percent supported transferring
Israeli Arabs. When the question of transfer was posed in a more roundabout
way, 60 percent of respondents said that they were in favor of encouraging
Israeli Arabs to leave the country. The results of the survey also reveal
that 24 percent of Israel's Jewish citizens believe that Israeli Arabs
are not loyal to the state, compared to 38 percent who think the Arabs
were loyal to the state at the beginning of the intifada. The poll,
overseen by Prof. Asher Arian, also finds that Jewish public opinion
is Israel has become more extreme on issues of foreign affairs and defense
as well as on possible concessions by Israel during peace talks in particular
... Some 72 percent of Jewish Israelis are opposed to Arab parties being
part of a coalition government, compared to 67 percent last year and
50 percent in 1999. This overall shift to the right has been coupled
by a significant fall in support for the Oslo process; down from 58
percent last year, to 35 percent this year. Support for the establishment
of a Palestinian state has also dropped from 57 percent last year to
49 percent this year."
Israel
to Halt 'Nazi-Style' Identity Marks for Palestinian Prisoners,
Ananova, March 12, 2002
"An Israeli MP who survived the Nazi Holocaust has condemned Israeli
troops writing ID numbers on the foreheads and arms of Palestinian detainees.
The detainees had the numbers stamped on them while awaiting interrogation
during an army sweep of a West Bank refugee camp. Lieutenant General
Shaul Mofaz said he had ordered an immediate halt to the numbering.
Yugoslav-born Tommy Lapid said he had earlier told Mofaz and
Defence Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer the practice must stop.
The Israeli army said the action was taken to identify and keep track
of prisoners last week in the Tulkarem refugee camp. 'As a refugee from
the Holocaust I find such an act insufferable,' Lapid said, adding that
Mofaz and Ben-Eliezer both pledged action. During the Second World War,
concentration camp inmates, most of them Jews, had numbers tattooed
on their forearms."
Controversy
Over 'Execution' Pictures, BBC News,
March 12, 2002
"Eleven photographs [three of the images are posted at BBC] taken
by an amateur photographer from his window in east Jerusalem have caused
outrage in the Arabic media, which allege they show the summary execution
of a Palestinian militant. Israeli police said the man was a would-be
suicide bomber who they were forced to kill to prevent him from detonating
a 'large explosive device' strapped to his waist. The AFP news agency
- which published the graphic, but inconclusive images below - said
it had received the testimonies of more than 10 eyewitnesses, who said
the man was shot half-an-hour after his arrest when he was completely
subdued." [Photos of this incident also here]
[Letter to Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon],
International Press Institute, March 13,
2002
"Your Excellency, The International Press Institute (IPI), the
global network of editors, media executives and leading journalists,
strongly condemns the Israeli army’s most recent attacks on journalists
and media outlets in the city of Ramallah. According to IPI’s sources,
on 12 and 13 March the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) stormed Ramallah
in its largest military offensive against Palestinians for 35 years.
Supported by at least 150 tanks, bulldozers, artillery and the air force,
the IDF laid siege to the city in an apparent punitive action against
Palestinians following an escalation in violence between the two sides.
On 13 March, an Italian freelance photographer was shot and killed in
Ramallah. According to several news reports, Raffaele Ciriello was hit
six or seven times in the chest by Israeli gunfire and died shortly
afterwards. On the same day, a French journalist, who was not immediately
identified, was wounded in the leg by gunfire in Ramallah ... Since
November 2000, four Palestinian journalists have also been killed and
many others injured. According to eyewitness accounts, on 12 March Israeli
troops in Ramallah confiscated a vehicle belonging to a media organisation
– an initial report said it belonged to Abu Dhabi Television – in an
apparent attempt to disguise themselves and carry out military operations
against Palestinians. The vehicle carried the word 'TV' in large, clear
markings. On the same day, heavy Israeli machinegun fire shattered the
windows of a Link Productions office at the City Inn Hotel in Ramallah,
narrowly missing Franz Normann, the correspondent for the Austrian public
broadcaster, ORF. Around 30 media workers from other media organisations
were also present in the building. Fortunately, there were no injuries
but gunfire destroyed an ABC camera after the fleeing crew left it on
its tripod. Reports from the journalists present indicated that there
were no ongoing hostilities in the area and the IDF was aware that journalists
occupied the building, most of whom worked for foreign media organisations.
At least two of these press freedom violations appear to be part of
a concerted strategy by the Israeli army to control reports on the recent
surge in armed hostilities in the region. In addition, IPI believes
they have been undertaken with a criminal disregard for civilian lives.
Moreover, the apparent decision by the IDF to disguise some of its forces
places journalists at risk."
McCalls'
Israel Trip Lingers as Issue in Governor's Race,
New York Times, by Adam Nagourney, March
12, 2002
"When H. Carl McCall, the state comptroller and a Democratic candidate
for governor of New York, visited Israel for three days last week, he
insisted that it was an official state visit to allow him to inspect
Israeli investments financed with the New York State pension fund. Even
though Mr. McCall acknowledged the trip could benefit his bid for governor,
he said it would be paid for mostly by the state pension fund, rather
than by his campaign. Yesterday, Mr. McCall's campaign acknowledged
the existence of a photograph from that trip taken of the comptroller
with a cocked M-16 held to his shoulder, conducting shooting practice
at what his aides said was an antiterrorist camp at an undisclosed location
in Israel."
Standing
Up for Israel, by Ruth Wisse, Harvard Crimson,
February 25, 2002
"Students who wish to defend Israel sometimes think that they are
engaged in a parochial cause that concerns them only because they are
Jewish, or because they have Jewish sympathies or Jewish friends. But
in fact, their fellow students may be afraid to stand up for the Jews
because of the enormity, intensity and ubiquity of the propaganda against
them. This is as true today as it was in the 1930s and for many of the
same reasons. Aggression against the Jews is the common denominator
of many of the greatest tyrannies of the modern age, and the epidemic
of anti-Semitism in Arab lands is all too disturbing evidence of the
drift of their political culture. To be sure, those who blame Israel
for the aggression against it usually deny that they are anti-Jewish.
They say that they are merely anti-Israel and anti-Zionist, not against
the Jewish people as such. But as Hillel Halkin sums it up in the latest
issue of Commentary, 'Israel is the state of the Jews. Zionism is the
belief that the Jews should have a state. To defame Israel is to defame
the Jews. To wish that it never existed, or would cease to exist, is
to wish to destroy the Jews.'”
Mubarek:
Israel's Policies Sowing Hatred in Arab World,
Haaretz, March 16, 2002
"In an exclusive interview broadcast Friday night on Channel One,
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak warned Israel that its policies toward
the Palestinians are sowing hatred for the country throughout the entire
Arab world. According to Mubarak, an entire generation of Arabs will
learn to hate Israel if the current situation continues for another
ten to fifteen years. 'How will you contend with 400 million people,'
the Egyptian president asked. Mubarak cited the role of the satellite
television and other forms of media in exposing Arabs to the policies
practiced by Israel. Asked about coming to Israel to speak directly
to the Israeli people, Mubarak said that in light of the killing that
is taking place, now was not the right time for him to visit Israel.
He noted that he sympathizes with the Palestinians as well as with the
'unarmed Israeli citizens killed in terror attacks.' Mubarak also warned
Israel not to consider transferring the Palestinians from the West Bank
and Gaza Strip to Jordan. According to Mubarak, such an act would pose
the biggest threat to Israel's existence. 'I am warning you. You will
be in great danger," he said. "Don't even consider such a thing.'"
Father,
Son Dead; Family Wonders Why,
Washington Post, March 13, 2002
"As Israeli forces rumbled close to his house, 54-year-old Abdul
Rahman Izzadin headed up the stairs and called down to his wife, children
and grandchildren to stay indoors. Those were the last words they heard
him say. At the top of the stairs, as he reached to close the metal
door leading to the rooftop, he was shot three times -- in the ear,
neck and cheek -- and killed instantly, apparently by an Israeli sniper
on the roof of an adjacent house that neighbors said the army had commandeered.
Moments later, when Izzadin's 36-year-old son Walid rushed to his father's
aid, he, too, was shot to death. It is not known why they were fired
upon. The Izzadins, killed as Israel invaded the Gaza Strip's Jabalya
refugee camp late Monday, were buried today. Weeping family members
accused Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of terrorism, and called
him a 'beast.' 'Oh, my son, my son, my beloved son!' sobbed Walid's
mother -- and Abdul Rahman's widow -- tears streaming down her cheeks.
Her enraged daughters and daughters-in-law grabbed the two men's bloodstained
clothes from a plastic sack and held them out to foreign visitors, as
if demanding an explanation. The Israeli invasion of Jabalya lasted
just three hours, from 10:30 p.m."
South
African Jews Turn Out for Israel During National Zionist Conference,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), March
11, 2002
"Hundreds of delegates rallied behind Israel at South Africa´s largest
Zionist conference in some 20 years. The 45th conference of the South
African Zionist Federation, held last weekend in Johannesburg, recalled
the vibrant movement that played a leading role in the community until
the late 1980s. With the 80,000-strong Jewish community feeling less
secure than it has for many years because of the government´s perceived
pro-Palestinian bias, the conference was a significant show of solidarity.
Speakers included South Africa´s deputy foreign minister, Aziz Pahad;
the leader of the opposition Democratic Alliance, Tony Leon;
and the chairman of the executive of the Jewish Agency for Israel, Sallai
Meridor ... Leon, who is Jewish and married to an Israeli, said
that 'too often, leading members of the government misuse my religion,
or my wife´s national origin, in a despicable attempt to place a bar
or ceiling on my party´s support.'"
Viva
La Similarities, Jewish Journal of Greater
Los Angeles, March 15, 2002
"It was a great idea: a restaurant gathering at Tomayo’s, an East
Los Angeles eatery known for its vibrant Latino cultural life, hosted
by Israel’s consul general in Los Angeles, that would unite Los Angeles’
Jews and Latinos. 'The idea was to bring the Jewish people to the Eastside
and have half Jewish food, half Mexican food,' said Yuval
Rotem, the Israeli consul general ... . [T]he Israeli consulate,
in conjunction with New America Alliance (NAA), finally realized its
multicultural mission by holding its inaugural Jewish-Latino event.
Such bonding is only natural in Los Angeles, said Rotem of the
city that happens to be home to the second-largest Jewish community
and the largest Latino community in the United States. 'I think these
kind of events help introduce different perceptions about each other,
as well as sensitivities toward each other,' Rotem said. 'It was extremely
festive,' said Naomi Rodriguez, the Israeli consulate’s liaison to the
Latino community. 'It was a huge party of community. It just felt like
family ... The Jewish-Latino function is not the consulate’s first gesture
to bring the two cultures together. A year-and-a-half ago, the Israeli
consulate took a bold step by hiring Rodriguez as its liaison to the
Latino community. According to Rotem, it was the first time that
a non-Jewish Latino was brought in on this level in any Israeli consulate.
Only this week, an Israeli consulate in Texas began employing a Latino
liaison. Rodriguez will be stepping down from the position she inaugurated
to work on L.A. Mayor James Hahn’s staff ... In assuming her role as
the mayor’s deputy director of protocol, Rodriguez said that she will
still work with the consulate on some level. 'I’m still going to do
whatever I can to move this agenda forward,' Rodriguez said. 'I had
a wonderful time working here. I just think I ended on a good note.'
Despite Rodriguez’s departure next week, 'this position is going to
be an integral part of the consulate,' said, Rotem, who added that the
consulate is currently interviewing candidates to fill Rodriguez’s shoes."
Watchdog
Slams Israeli Army's Open Fire Rules,
Yahoo!News, March 21, 2002
"An Israeli watchdog group slammed the Israeli army on Thursday
for what it called lax open-fire regulations that allowed 'trigger-happy'
soldiers to kill or injure many innocent Palestinians. The Israeli Information
Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, known as B'Tselem,
also said in a report, based mainly on the testimonies of Israeli soldiers
who had served in the West Bank and Gaza Strip (news - web sites), that
the army rarely investigated attacks on innocent Palestinians. The report,
entitled 'Trigger Happy,' said the Israeli Defense Force had secretly
relaxed open-fire regulations after the outbreak of the Palestinian
uprising, through the expansion of the term 'life-threatening situation.'
'The IDF's open-fire policy throughout this intifada (uprising) has
resulted in extensive harm to Palestinian civilians who were not involved
in any activity against Israel,' a summary of the 44-page report said.
'These incidents are not 'exceptional' cases, but rather they constitute
a large portion of the casualties throughout the occupied territories,'
it added."
Christian
Broadcaster Urges Americans to Visit Israel,
Jerusalem Post, March 22, 2002
"Proudly declaring his 'passionate' support for Israel, Christian
Broadcasting Network (CBN) president Michael D. Little yesterday called
on American Christians to visit the Jewish state and pray for its well-being.
'Israel is an important country to the United States and to Bible-believing
Christians. This is the time to support Israel like never before. We
must align ourselves in solidarity with them,' said Little, visiting
here for the 38th time since 1973, in an interview to be broadcast on
JPost Radio ... As chief operating officer of CBN, Little administers
a broadcasting network with over 1 million viewers daily across the
United States. CBN programming, which includes daily news and features,
is also transmitted via satellite to Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.
The network was founded 40 years ago by Pat Robertson, the television
evangelist and former Republican presidential candidate."
Israeli Weapons Bear an Embarassing Label: Made in USA,
Sydney Morning Herald, March 23, 2002
"British objections to the use of British-supplied weapons in Israel's
latest military push against the Palestinians have focused new attention
on the United States' reluctance to restrain Israel's use of the multi-billion-dollar,
high-tech arms it sells to the Jewish state each year. The US is embarrassed
by the high profile given to some of its machinery in the occupied territories
- particularly its F-16 fighter jets, in missile strikes against police
stations and other public buildings, and its Apache attack helicopters,
in Israel's controversial campaign to assassinate Palestinian militants.
But the Administration has refused to go public with its growing unease
over the use of US weaponry, in what the UN Secretary-General, Kofi
Annan, now calls an 'all-out conventional war' on Palestinian civilians.
But last week Britain revealed that in 2000 it had extracted a written
assurance from Israel that no military equipment originating from Britain
would be used in the occupied territories. The revelation was sparked
when a British diplomat stationed in the Middle East recognised an Israeli
armoured personnel carrier as a modified Centurion tank, which Britain
had supplied to Israel up until 1970. Now Britain is demanding an explanation
from the Israelis."
Controlled
Media,
Haaretz, March 26, 2002
"The [Israeli] public broadcasting system has always been a pawn
in the hands of the politicians. All the previous prime ministers appointed
their people to senior executive positions - director general, chairman,
Israel Radio chief, and director general of Israel Television - and
even tried influencing lower-ranking executives. Their aides often tried
to intervene in the content of the IBA's programming, causing damage
to the professional ethical values to which all journalists are committed,
and to the integrity required of public servants. Ariel Sharon is
continuing that tradition - though in a blatant and ruthless manner.
That over-involvement is the result of a malignant anomaly characterizing
the public broadcasting system in Israel: the subordination of the press
and creative production to the government's control, and the lack of
any protective mechanisms to enable independent management of these
systems. Channel One, Channel 33, the state radio networks, Educational
Television (which is subordinate to the Education Ministry) and Army
Radio, are all crooked creatures of this anomaly. All suffer from professional
erosion, damage to professional norms of behavior for journalists, hidden
unemployment, and bad management."
Red
Cross Head in Israel: IDF has 'Trampled' on Geneva Conventions,
Haaretz, March 20, 2002
"The chief representative for the International Committee of the
Red Cross in Israel and the Palestinian areas has lambasted the Israel
Defense Forces' behavior toward medical teams in the territories. Rene
Kosirnik said on Monday he felt 'betrayed' by the IDF's actions, and
that the army had 'wantonly and crudely trampled' all over the Fourth
Geneva Convention protocols, which expressly forbids shooting at ambulances.
Speaking with members of the French Senate's Foreign Affairs and Defense
Committee, on a visit to the area, Kosirnik said that in his 25 years
in the field, he has never experienced such a difficult time as this
current point in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He mentioned the
four doctors, medics and Palestinian ambulance drivers killed by IDF
fire in recent weeks, and another 12 who have been wounded, five of
them seriously. 'I was shocked and deeply hurt,' said Kosirnik. 'I expected
much more of the IDF. Nothing justifies such behavior.' He went on to
say that he was yet to receive any proof of the IDF claims that the
Palestine Red Crescent Society ambulances were being used to smuggle
armed activists and he said there was no 'terrorist or warrior' among
the medical workers who had been killed or injured. Kosirnik talked
of how he felt betrayed by the IDF, as it had promised his organization
that it would allow ambulances to pass through checkpoints unscathed,
but had, in some cases, opened fire on them anyway."
2
Grieving Mothers; 2 Points of View,
Seattle P-I, March 25, 2002
"Robi Damelin thought of her 28-year-old son David
as a "best friend," a fellow non-conformist who talked to her about
art and philosophy and shared her left-wing politics. She urged him
to skip his reserve duty even if it meant going to jail. In Israeli
newspapers and on television, she has been telling the world that her
son died in vain, for what she sees as the ugly face of Israel's occupation
of Palestinian territories and the expansion of Jewish settlements there
... In Tel Aviv, the secular heart of the Jewish state, Damelin is a
self-assured public relations executive in her 50s. She says David died
protecting the [Jewish] settlements, which she calls 'ghettos of hate.'
She blames the 'world of cliches' that Israeli leaders use when they
say the country needs settlements for its security and that the Arabs
cannot be trusted to make peace. 'We haven't tried another way, have
we?' she asked. 'Violence brings violence. It's just more of the same
thing ... until somebody sits down and talks, this is going to be the
daily bread of the Israelis and the Palestinians.'"
The Israel Lobby,
by Michael Lind,
Prospect (UK), April 2002
"America's unconditional support for Israel runs counter to
the interests of the US and its allies. We need an open, unprejudiced
debate about it. The indifference of much of the national security
elite and the public to the [Middle East], in between crises, permitted
US policy to be dominated by two US domestic lobbies, one ethnic and
one economic-the Israel lobby and the oil industry (which occasionally
clashed over issues like US weapons sales to Saudi Arabia). Times have
changed. The collapse of the Soviet empire created a power vacuum which
has been filled by the US, first in the Persian Gulf following the Gulf
war, and now in central Asia as a result of the Afghan war. Today the
middle east is becoming the centre of US foreign policy -- a fact illustrated
in the most shocking way by the al Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington.
A debate within the US over the goals and methods of American policy
in the middle east is long overdue. Unfortunately, an uninhibited debate
is not taking place, because of the disproportionate influence of the
Israel lobby. Today the Israel lobby distorts US foreign policy in a
number of ways. Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, enabled
by US weapons and money, inflames anti-American attitudes in Arab and
Muslim countries. The expansion of Israeli settlements on Palestinian
land makes a mockery of the US commitment to self-determination for
Kosovo, East Timor and Tibet. The US strategy of dual containment of
Iraq and Iran, pleases Israel -- which is most threatened by them-but
violates the logic of realpolitik and alienates most of America's other
allies. Beyond the region, US policy on nuclear weapons proliferation
is undermined by the double standard that has led it to ignore Israel's
nuclear programme while condemning those of India and Pakistan. The
debate that is missing in the US is not one between Americans who want
Israel to survive and those -- a marginal minority -- who want Israel
to be destroyed. The US should support Israel's right to exist within
internationally-recognised borders and to defend itself against threats.
What is needed is a debate between those who want to link US support
for Israel to Israeli behaviour, in the light of America's own strategic
goals and moral ideals, and those who want there to be no linkage. For
the American Israel lobby, Tony Smith observes in his authoritative
study, Foreign Attachments: The Power of Ethnic Groups in the Making
of American Foreign Policy (Harvard), "to be a 'friend of Israel' or
'pro-Israel' apparently means something quite simple: that Israel alone
should decide the terms of its relations with its Arab neighbours and
that the US should endorse these terms, whatever they may be.'"
Arabs and Europeans
Criticize Israel, US Stands By Its Ally,
Yahoo!News (from AFP), March 30, 2002
"Arab and European states criticized Israel on Friday and mounted
a diplomatic drive to cut short its military drive against the Palestinians,
but the United States stood by its main Middle East ally. US Secretary
of State Colin Powell did not endorse Israel's incursion into Yasser
Arafat's base in the West Bank city of Ramallah, but said Washington
recognized Israel's right to defend itself. He blamed Arafat for failing
to curb the violence, including a suicide bombing that killed 21 holidaymakers
Wednesday on the northern Israel coast, prompting the Israeli riposte
and dealing a new blow to US peace efforts ... Arafat, in a TV interview
by telephone, said Israel could not have launched its offensive without
Washington's approval. 'The entire world should be aware that Israel
does not, and can not, act without American consent,' he said. Arab
officials spoke among themselves and contacted the United States and
other powers on behalf of Arafat, who has been cooped up by the Israelis
in Ramallah for four months."
|