|
America is apparently going to War, embarking
on God knows what deadly future for us all. We are preparing our troops
and planes to rush across the world to slaughter those that dare to resist
American Might and Will, killing them -- with mechanical drones and robots
of all sorts -- in the name of Truth and Liberty. It is
explained to us by the web of propagandists throughout our cultural matrix
that too many crazy Arabs don't like "freedom" -- they are jealous
of our whorehouses and criminal drug barons, urban murder rates, increasing
school illiteracy, media monopolies, widening gap between rich and poor,
stuffed prisons, moral decadence, public condemnation of religious faith,
consumerist zombi-ism, endemic alienation and estrangement, and TV's celebration
of mindless decadence and hedonism. Not to mention Jewish and Israeli
ethnocentrism everywhere, to the social and political bone. These
Islamic religious fanatics' jealousy of all this impels them to destroy
our world in order to be comfortable in their fanatically oppressive religious
chains.
Every day the American government conjures up more excuses to invade Iraq,
which is ruled by the Ba'thist party (a form of socialism), incongruously
linking that nation to Osama Bin Laden's ruthless Islamic revolt against
Western imperialism. What they both have in common is that they are Arab,
they are of Muslim heritage, and they both loathe America/Israel and each
other. Iraq is a country that has been significantly demilitarized a decade
ago. Iraq was also the nation supported by the United States in its invasion
of Iran, and the subsequent war -- in the 1980s -- was a delight in U.S.
policy's efforts to harm and hinder the spread of Iranian-style militant
(Shi'ite) Islam. Iraq was also a nation that was aided in its various
weapons programs -- including biological -- by mostly Western (including
American) corporations for decades.
Our dutifully helpful mass media recently informed us that President Bush
has just received his smallpox shot in anticipation of bio-terrorism,
a signal that Americans should be soon getting theirs too. Unfortunately,
we are also told, a certain percentage of the populace can expect to die
from the smallpox vaccine itself. But that's part of the risk of protection.
And, President Bush might tell us, it's the price of Liberty. Don't you
see? If you really want to be free, you've got to pay the price for
it.
This kind of Orwellian doublethink brings us directly to the subject at
hand. American planners are mapping a new kind of war. Ostensibly this
war is against a nebulous entity called "terrorism," closer
to a virus than a state. This "terrorism" (a tool which was
honed to a revolutionary science on behalf of Jewish
"independence" in what used to be known as Palestine until
1948) is basically of the Islamic variety, and every day we hear about
new forms of constraint upon American citizens: Internet monitoring, new
policing devices, video surveillance of public protests, a national ID
card, prospects for torturing detainees -- each rooting us deeper into
the Orwellian quicksand, more deeply pinned to the mercies of an unaccountable
cabal, gone mad within the high walls of Big Government.
In essence, whatever the rationale for our New World Order and its unlimited
war on the vague, omnipresent and ambiguous "terrorist" ("Is
he your neighbor?"), the American government has decided it doesn't
trust you.
The first victim of the American government's war on terrorism, of course,
is freedom. The right to freely associate with others. The right to privacy.
The right to oversee the government as an instrument to aid its citizens
and not a hammer to oppress them.
And then there is of course the Right to Free Speech, something that been
consistently eroded for decades now. If you, for example, dare to criticize
Jews, their fervent politicizing on behalf of their ethnocentric interests,
and their omnipresent chauvinistic Lobby, you're decreed to be a "hater"
of course, subject in some Western countries -- from Canada to Australia
-- to fines and imprisonment.
So, how, dear God, have we all arrived at this place, waking up -- suddenly
-- as a jet glides in from the clouds into the World Trade Center ("Why?
Why?!"), bringing with it the horrible prospects of a looming world
war, vengeful "terrorists" hell-bent on murdering entire cities,
increasing public sanction to revile entire branches of people -- Muslim
religious "fundamentalists" -- as collectively violent and insane,
increased wariness and suspicion, and increased suppression of our once
common rights of American intellectual "freedom" and political
expression?
Israel. And its international Jewish lobby. And the fact that it
is forbidden to say this, of course, is the central part of the problems
we have. The Wizard of Oz behind the drape wants the veil kept tightly
sealed. And no pebble, or mountain, has been left unturned in the effort
to accomplish this.
How on Earth have we arrived to this bizarre scenario wherein Osama Bin
Laden articulates exactly his reasons for war against
American interests and, in order to read them, an American has to
look at Great Britain's Observer newspaper because no American
media outlet will dare to publish them? Why? Because Bin Laden's complaint
points directly to what those who run the media don't want you to talk
about: Jews. That's spelled J-E-W-S. And how can we confront the
core of all our problems (AND RESOLVE THEM!) with Bin Laden and his raging
cohorts if, categorically and institutionally, we are forbidden to say
the "J' word (for which Mr. Laden has a HUGE gripe) in any context
short of the laudatory? Why is one of the guiding principles of our modern
social Gatekeepers -- of which Jews are so astoundingy influential --
that Jews MUST NEVER take public offense, even if they are indeed -- as
a political movement -- guilty of something? The Jewish entity is CATEGORICALLY
innocent of everything, always, everywhere, as we all well know. Have
we all not been trained -- at enormous indoctrinational effort -- to think
so?
Jewry's self-decreed group identity and incessantly activist political
pushes are quite forbidden from notice, let alone critical inquiry,
let alone deconstructive attack. Orwellian "PC-speak" decrees
as much, because to talk about "Jews" is a "generalization"
about an ethnic people, and the generalization that doesn't exist decrees
that it is not fair to talk about Jews and Zionism because there are two
or three Jews in every Jewish crowd who don't have the rest's bone-core
allegiance to Israel. Have not dedicated social engineers scurried about
in every corner of public discourse with masking tape and black paint
FOR DECADES to insure this absurd censorial situation for us?
Israel, the Beloved of international Jewry, is a racist country. And a
brutal one. Widely heralded and propagandized by American Jewry (and the
American government, and others at the mercy of Jewish coffers) as the
"only democracy in the Middle East,"
it is the kind of democracy that the Mad Hatter might proclaim to a dazed
Titmouse as he collapses, stoned, at tea. Israel is emphatically, as everywhere
decreed, a "Jewish" state for "Jews." To the degree
it has a "democratic" system of public voting and the illusionary
accouterments of a just society, it is likewise safely embedded in the
Jewish framework that Israel is also an obsessively "demographic"
nation: i.e., as long as it is assured that Israel's non-Jewish Arab community
is comparatively tiny and segregated (in both schools, jobs, and housing),
the "democracy" will function -- as planned -- as a latent apartheid
state. The Israeli Arab birthrate has long been a source of lament to
Jewish Israeli commentators, for it far outstrips Jewish propagation.
The short-term solution to guarantee massive Jewish population dominance
has been Open Doors to (only) Jewish immigrants to Israel from throughout
the world (primarily Russia).
In any case, if 80% of the declared Jewish Mad Hatter "democratic"
nation is indeed Jewish Mad Hatters, we may expect the remaining 20% of
the population (Arabs) to be systematically disadvantaged and exploited
by the ruling race. (Race, indeed. Again, the official criteria
to ascertain whether one is technically a Jew or not for immigration purposes
to Israel is genetic: whether or not one's mother was Jewish).
The Arabs of Israel are an underclass in all respects to their segregated
Jewish neighbors, and this is a common feature of Israeli sociological
studies. The Arabs of the Occupied Territories (the area of Gaza and the
West Bank of the Jordan River) represent an even more oppressive scenario.
These lands, comprising an Arab population of about three million people,
were seized in the Israeli-Arab war of 1967. Ever since then the Arab
(Palestinian) populace has lived in a stateless limbo, subject to Israeli
military rule and complete control of all facets of their lives and economy.
The hundreds of thousands of Palestinians crammed in Gaza live in an area
about 10x30 miles wide, one side against the sea. They are literally fenced
in. (Per the West Bank, on the opposite border of the Jewish state, the
Israelis are currently building a "Berlin Wall" to separate
their formal boundaries from the Arabs of the West Bank).
But, of course, this kind of talk is boring. Americans would rather go
trout fishing, drink tequilas at a corner nightclub, watch roaring autos
zoom around in circles at a stockcar race. But when a commandeered airliner
drops in out of the Blue onto one of THESE too, and that rainbow trout
or stockcar flops up out of the water or off the track into your lap in
a nuclear haze, the bewilderment will even be more than that of the attacks
on the World Trade Center. Why? Why? Why? Why do they hate us?
How can this question be answered if no one has ears to listen? And, worse,
how can answers be created if the data to form even the simplest questions
are systematically screened from public discussion? Why, indeed. Why do
the Palestinian people, Arabs, and the Muslim world at-large have such
antipathy to America, its "values," and its foreign policies?
Because the results of American actions on the other side of the world
are seen for what they nakedly are when stripped of its "special
interest group" smokescreen: oppressive, exploitive, suffocating,
unjust, vicious, tyrannical, and hypocritical.
The American social and political choir has been ardently Jewish and/or
Judeo-centric for decades now. Just a few examples to whet your appetite:
The three major TV networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) were built to power by Jewish
moguls, Sarnoff, Goldenson, and Paley. Hollywood has been a nepotistic
Jewish fiefdom since its founding. The current four commissioners of professional
football, baseball, hockey, and basketball are all Jewish (Paul Tagliabue,
Bud Selig, Gary Bettman, and David Stern). Washington DC itself has turned
into a big Zionist whorehouse and if Americans were not always carefully
deflected from paying attention to this, there would be daily mass marches
on the White House against the Star of David that
has been draped across its doors. When two former CIA analysts recently
had the guts to declare the rampant "dual loyalty" in the current
Bush administration (one loyalty to the U.S., another to Israel), one
is inclined to wonder, "Well, what took you so long to write such
an article?" By 1996, the director of the CIA was Jewish (John
Deutch, who was eventually pardoned by departing President Clinton even
before an investigation of why he had classified documents at his home),
as were four of seven CIA directorates. There is speculation, always,
in Washington corridors -- not if there ARE any -- but HOW many -- high-level
Jewish American government officials are Zionist spies ( like the notorious
Jonathan Pollard) for Israel.
Modern
Jewish American identity -- which casts its long shadow across all American
culture -- is rife with neurosis, self-delusion, moral fraud, and hypocrisy.
On one hand, Jews have been in the vanguard in destroying the assimilative
"melting pot" premise of immigrant America into a mosaic of
multicultural ethnocentrisms, the most notable POLITICIZED American
ethnocentrism being Zionism: Jewish allegiance to a country across
the world. Indeed, for way too many, the very heart of Jewish American
identity beams its way across the Atlantic Ocean to Israel, a country
where "multiculturalism" is absolutely ANATHEMA to the
premises of a JEWISH state, a state condemned by so many as an
apartheid one.
In fact, in dialectical opposition to the successful multicultural socialization
process in the United States and all the Jewish Lobby Agency's social
engineering of "tolerance" for Jewish racism and chauvinism,
a 2000 survey of Israeli high school students
by Hebrew University in Jerusalem found that "hate" was an endemic
feature of growing up in the Jewish state. 51% of surveyed high school
students declared that they "hate" Arabs. "The kind of
hatred that we found in our study simply doesn't dissipate over a few
years," said one of the Israeli researchers, "... The point
is that this should be a warning to our society. These kids hate, and
with such depths of hatred, our society is in deep trouble. When you hate
someone because they are different from you, you might also start to think
that this person is somehow less worthy, less entitled to the same rights
and privileges, less human."
Jews have also spearheaded the American "separation of Church
and State" game, and everywhere pop forward to condemn public
expressions of anything Christian, including Christmas. Meanwhile, in
Beloved Israel, to which American Jews are overwhelmngly faithful and
dedicated, Orthodox Judaism rules civil administrative society. Jews are
even legally forbidden from marrying non-Jews in the Jewish state.
Public transportation shuts down on Saturday -- for Christians and Muslims
alike -- because its the Jewish day of rest. Want to change your religion
in Israel? You'll have to go to a government office, and if you're Jewish
the officals there will try to make you change
your mind.
Rooted in an activist Jewish network throughout popular U.S. culture,
we can trace with increasing horror the steady "Israelization"
of American foreign policy. And now with increased regimentation, citizen
surveillance, intellectual suppression, and security obsessions, American
life itself. Israel (and, whatever else it is, it is a quintessential
MILITARY state) has always had a "preemptive" policy
against its enemies. The Jewish state murders people it merely worries
about, even before they've done anything. These are usually people suspected
of planning violence against the institutionalization of Israeli violence,
a cycle that can only roll on into Infinity's Great Loop until all are
dead or physically driven away on either side -- or both sides -- of the
argument.
Israel has always had a policy of "preemptive targeting," one
of its euphemisms for its long standing policy of assassinations. There
is no trial for the murdered. They are suspected of plotting violent activity
against the Jewish state, and they are murdered as quickly as possible.
"Unnamed security personnel make a decision to kill a person, and
the decision is carried out with no legal process
whatsoever." Drastic mistakes are someteimes made (wrong person
killed, innocent people killed around the "target," etc.), but
Jewish lives are abstractly saved in the process. And that's all that
matters, anywhere, always, isn't it?
Of course we live in a social world where to surface these verifiable
truths is to court the defamatory charge of "anti-Semitism"
and to thereby face marginalization in all walks of life as a moral lunatic.
Such is the totalitarianism of our intellectual and ethical worlds. But
what exactly IS the charge of anti-Semitism? How can it fairly be defined
in today's political world if not now merely a manipulative political
and social tool, as hypocritical as the rest of Jewish/Israeli moral baggage.
The Jewish charge of "antisemitism" has been exploited so many
times, and so indiscriminately, that its moral currency is quickly becoming
exhausted. Thanks to Jewish self-obsessions lost in their propagandistic
webs, it seems that the day is nearing when to call someone an "anti-Semite"
for the atrocious behavior of the state of Israel will be tantamount to
being awarded a badge of moral honor. "Righteous Gentile," indeed.
The most astounding example of such Jewish moral fraud may well be the
Simon Wiesenthal's new "tolerance" center in Jerusalem. (The
Wiesenthal Center is one of the two best known defenders of Jewish chauvinism,
in the guise of fighting intolerance and "anti-Semitism." The
other best-known "defense organization" is the Anti-Defamation
League, which was caught spying on all sorts of political organizations
across the political spectrum, paid off some lawsuits, and in more recent
years lost a $10.5 million lawsuit against it by a Denver film producer,
William Quigley, who was smeared by ADL as -- what else? -- an "anti-Semite."
Both Jewish "anti-hate" monoliths are, meanwhile, emphatic defenders
of racist, "hating," dual-moral-standard Israel.) Ostensibly
built as a beacon to inter-ethnic "tolerance," the Jerusalem
building is built on a Muslim cemetery. It cost
millions of dollars to build, and -- despite this astounding embarrassment
-- it won't be torn down in shame any time soon. Rather, the Muslim bones
will just be swept under the Jewish Tolerant rug, so to speak. What this
building symbolizes, then, is that the Jewish demand for "tolerance"
is, at root among the broken Muslim spinal cords and femurs, fraud.
Jewish and Israeli demand to be beyond the pale of criticism is actually
an incessant push for "Tolerance's" opposite: popular
passive acceptance of Jewish collective racism, dissimulation,
manipulation, and hypocrisy.
The great United States has become Little Israel, a client state of the
Jewish world network for Jewish international interests. Massive Jewish
American social engineering, political intrigue, economic manipulation,
and two-faced morality has carved the prospect of more Death from Life,
and cast the future of the American people in the dim glow of Israel's
world-hated image. Israel and America have become two heads of the same
monster. David has now succeeded in slinging the drugged Goliath over
his shoulder and wears G's great girth like an iron umbrella into every
battle.
How bad is American morality tumbling down the Jewish/Israeli drain tunnels?
In June 2002, Nathan Lewin, "a prominent Washington attorney
and Jewish communal leader" called "for
the execution of family members of suicide bombers." This call
came in an article Lewin wrote for a Jewish journal of ethics (!),
Sh'ma. He wrote that the way for Israel to solve its "suicide
bomber" problem is to start murdering everyone
in the bomber's immediate family, whether they knew anything about
their kin's bombing plans or not. This article shocks the moral reader
for many reasons.
1) Lewin is not an obscure kook. He is a prominent Jewish American
religious figure. And his championing of the killing of innocent people
as institutionalized policy is based upon his learned interpretation
of Jewish religious law, particularly with regard to the Israelites' Biblical
nemesis, the Amelekites. He finds justification for his proposed policy
of collective murder in Jewish religious lore.
2) Lewin was afforded forum for his suggestion to murder in a journal
about Jewish ethics, Sh'ma. Although Lewin's suggestion is condemned
in a follow-up article in the same journal by Arthur Green, the
issue of collective punishment -- via summary execution of innocent people
-- is given forum in the Jewish American community as a legitimate
issue of discussion and debate.
3) Lewin's call to murder of family members is actually a call
to genocide. Lewin's justification for
such murder is based upon the story of the Amalekites -- an ancient, hated
nemesis in Jewish religious lore. God, as written in the Old Testament/Torah,
not only sanctions, but DEMANDS their complete extermination by the ancient
Israelites.
4) In any other community, a discussion of the merits of institutionalizing
the murdering of innocents would be condemned for what it is: civilized
savagery, and its adherents punished (fired, fined, squeezed for a public
apology, etc. -- Note, for example, the pressures Senator Paul Lott has
recently faced to quit his Congress position for his comments in support
of former Southern senator Strom Thurmond, comments which drastically
pale in comparison to Lewin's public call to the murder of innocent
people, expressly of another ethnicity.)
5) The call for systemic murder of innocents by a prominent member of
the Jewish community is certainly newsworthy, but its propagation was
very, very limited to a couple ethnic Jewish journals (including the Forward).
If a prominent "white nationalist," or the likes of Louis Farrakhan
of the Nation of Islam, made such a call against another people, rest
assured it would appear in every major newspaper in America and the author
of such a conviction would be driven from public forum forever. (Note,
for example, the massive mass media attention afforded Farrakhan's out-of-context
quip about Judaism being a "gutter religion" a few years ago).
6) Once one condones the murder of innocent "family" members,
why not their friends, who could surely be suspect at the same level?
Why not their neighbors? Why not their towns? And, of course, why not
anyone who knew them at all, and -- really, this is the core of it --
why not whoever has sympathy with Palestinian resistance to Israeli domination
-- violently or otherwise? That would be just about any Palestinian.
But, hey. While we're at it, why not other Arabs? Most of them sympathize
with Palestinians too, and their "guilt by association" is just
as legitimate.
In essence, Lewin's call for murder is Adolf Hitler reborn. (Or, more
correctly, the WORST of Judaism reborn, via Old Testament sanction for
genocide, which precludes the birth of Aryan fascism). And an acceptance
of Lewin's calling for collective death as punishment for individual acts
could just as well be logically (?) stretched to pardon the mass murderers
of Jews in Nazi Germany. The quintessential "collective punishment,"
which is military policy in today's Israel, was of course the foundation
of German fascism's barbarities against Jews.
Do we teach our children on the playground "collective punishment?"
Does any self-proclaimed "civilized" community institutionalize
punishment of ALL for the sins of the minuscule few? (And please bear
in mind that this call to Jewish murder is the direct opposite of our
Jewish-lobbied "politically correct" culture which declares
that even making a generalization about any group of people
-- let alone killing them all! -- is immoral).
Lewin is not alone in his calls for the ripping away of Western
civilization's principles of moral fabric. He has fellow Jewish champions
for the moral slide of our New Jewish/Israeli America, which seeks to
readjust public policy towards killing or maiming those we don't like.
Alan Dershowitz, for example, famous Harvard "civil rights"
and Judeo-centric activist, has publicly called
for the institutionalization of torture as an option in law enforcement.
This, long a taboo in America and other "civilized" countries,
is another moral gift from the Jewish lobby and Israel: torture has been
a tool for decades in the Jewish state against Palestinian prisoners,
condemned by human rights organizations like Amnesty International.
In essence, what the likes of Dershowitz and Lewis suggest is the American
emulation of Israel. It is the transporting, and imposing, of ruthless
Jewish/Israeli survivalist values to be grafted -- like a thorn branch
onto a peach tree -- onto distinctly American ethics. The threat to us
all is that the thorn branch (call it Jewish, or if you are afraid to
say that, call it Israeli) is taking over. And this is all, of course,
declared to be in the Holy Name of fighting "terror," which
-- whether you like to hear the truth or not -- is essentially the violent
expression of a desperately exasperated Arab/Muslim liberation movement
against Israel and Western imperialism. And, in support of the Israeli
logic of brutality, insofar as the Jewish lobby has successfully swayed
the American government to function as little more than a robotic apparatus
of Israeli will, it is only NATURAL now that the American government
(and American people) will follow Israeli policies because America has
BECOME an appendange of Israeli lifesyle and policy.
Ultimately, to the degree the American government supports crimes against
another people, we will be inevitably held to reasonable standards of
condemnation by Palestinians, Arabs, and other Third World people.
So, let's review what Americans get for ignorantly surrendering themselves
to Judeocentric interests. What has our 84 billion
dollars to Israel provided American citizens over the years? And,
like it or not, the classic "anti-Semitic" stereotype of the
Jew as "parasite" upon the non-Jewish social body has been fulfilled
in the grandest, nationalist terms: if there ever was a parasite on the
American people, it is the little leech of Israel with the enormous mouth,
and its yearly sucking of billions of dollars from American social, economic,
and educational welfare. This is the world's greatest
welfare state that would perish as it is presently (immorally) constituted
without American charity.
The following eyebrow-raising facts about the wonderful Jewish state is
just a sampling. So what do Americans get for our massive stuffing
of billions into Israel, the Jewish "light unto the world?"
1) An undying -- and spreading -- hatred of America and Israel
by untold millions of people throughout the world, largely from -- but
not only -- Islamic countries who recognize only brutality and hypocrisy
when it thinks of this Tweedle Dee-Tweedle Dum duo, a brutality that is
systematically screened and qualified by America's Judeocentric mass media
and political pundits.
2) The prospects of an American war on behalf of Israeli interests
to remold an Arab regime as a client state to Jewish needs, at the cost
of up to a trillion dollars to be borne by American
citizens, and untold American and Iraqi lives and suffering while Israelis
watch, protected by new forms of American defensive missiles. (Also,
of course, is the prospect for extended world war and chaos of all varieties
and in all places).
3) An American government swarming -- at all tiers -- with Jewish
dual loyalists who harbor divided allegiance between Israel and the
United States.
4) An open invitation (thanks to incessant Jewish American lobbying
to brings masses of Russian Jews to our shores) for the notorious Russian
Mafia (which is largely Jewish) to take hold
in America. As an American state department official noted in the mid-1990s,
ALL major Russian Mafia members in the U.S. had
Israeli passports.
5) Support for a country, Israel, where "money
laundering has reached colossal proportions in the last few years,
fuelled by the rise of Russian organised-crime since the collapse of the
Soviet Union."
6) A draining of American economic resources from crucial education
and social problems to buttress an increasingly neo-fascistic
military garrison across the world. Even as we prepare to go to war with
Iraq on behalf of Israel at an ultimate cost of perhaps a trillion dollars,
the American Congress had not bothered to extend unemployment benefits
for the jobless into 2003.
7) Support for the international "sex
slave" trade, of which Israel ranks near the top in the world
(and, as addenda, the Jewish preeminence in
the American pornography and smut worlds). "Israel does not
yet meet the minimum standards for combating trafficking in persons,
and has not yet made significant efforts to combat the problem,"
noted the U.S. State Department in 2001.
8) Support for a nation that has gone mad
with violence, even within the intra-Jewish sphere. Over 11% of Israeli
women have been assaulted by their husbands. In a country of about 4 million
Jews, 142,000 women were beaten in the past year, 40,000 required medical
treatment, and 15,000 were hospitalized. "146,000 women were raped
at least once and 2 percent of these were threatened with murder ... Some
417,000 children up to the age of five (57 percent of the children this
age) have suffered moderate corporal punishment such as being shaken,
pushed or slapped ... Of the six to 18 year olds, more than 550,000 -
39 percent of all the children - suffered moderate violence in past year,
while 115,000 (8 percent) suffered severe violence." The Israeli
newspaper Ha'aretz even declared "Something
evidently is very wrong with our society. Lack of manners, rudeness, hot
tempers, impatience, aggressive attitudes, and violence have become hallmarks
of our behavior to each other, and the symptoms are getting worse by the
day ... What, then, has happened to us? Why have the ugly features of
our society become so predominant?"
9) Support for a nation that recently refused
to join a new International Code of Conduct aimed at "blocking
proliferation of ballistic missile technology."
10) Support for a country that was found in 1998 to be "an
international center for pirate distribution - estimating that the
extent of the forgery industry reached tens, maybe hundreds, of millions
of dollars."
11) Support for Israel's severe lack of press freedom (i.e., media
free speech). Of 139 countries, in 2002 Israel's press freedom was ranked
92nd by the Reporters Without Borders press organization. This
number nestles among Third World potentates and dictatorial banana republics.
Even Israel's immediate nemesis, the battered Palestinian Authority, ranked
better than the Israeli state, ranked at number 82.
12) Support of Israel's preeminence in the world of the immoral
and exploitative buying and selling body organs,
largely cut out of the non-Jewish poor, throughout the Third World.
13) Support of an endemically corrupt, racketeering Jewish country
the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz deplored as "Racketstan."
14) Support of an apartheid regime, a country that practices "ethnic
cleansing" even upon its Christian members.
15) Support for a country that uses Lutheran schoolchildren
as human shields.
16) Support of, arguably, the most obnoxious
people in the world. The Israeli "sabra" national personality
is renowned for its rudeness, lack of civility, arrogance, and "chutzpah,"
and is commented upon throughout the Jewish/Israeli community. In kind,
in counterpoint, Palestinians/Arabs (long known for their generous hospitality)
are rendered on the popular media stage to be virtually animals.
17) Support for a country that kills children "for
sport," buries people alive, drops
1,000-pound bombs on schools for the blind, murders
95-year old women, and comes under condemnation
by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch for "war
crimes."
18) Support for a nation that imposes curfews on Palestinians and
kills them if they violate it. In one four-month period 80%
of those murdered this way were children.
19) Support for the Israeli military that routinely tortures
people, sometimes including children.
20) Support for the legendary land of a people who perpetually
whine and make more and more demands for reparations, and requisite homage,
for past historical events including the "Holocaust" that happened
during a World War across the Earth over half a century ago, as PART
of a catastrophic World War that took between a forgotten 50-60 million
lives. The socialization process of homage to Jewish victimhood and Jewish
socio-political advantage -- as well as providing a "moral"
undergirding for the outrages of modern racist Israel -- includes Jewish-dominated
Hollywood's 170+ films
about the Holocaust, enough to take up most of your time in between
helping your kid study for his Holocaust Appreciation classes.
21) Support for the country awarded in 2002 the world's worst
housing rights violator award by the Geneva-based Center on Housing
Rights and Evictions (COHRE).
22) Support for Israel as the world's record
holder in ignoring United Nations Security Council resolutions. (Disobeying
such UN resolution is, of course, a major justification cited for U.S.
plans to invade Israel's enemy, Iraq). Israel, through 2002, has violated
UN Security Council resolutions 32 times.
23) Support for a country that is so dangerously oppressive to
United Nations workers that they feel compelled to band together to write
a formal petition against Israeli "harassment, beating and killing
of United Nations staff."
24) Support for a country, Israel, which passes
along American weapons technology to its nemesis: China.
25) Support for a country that gets billions of dollars to buy
military equipment and then plans on parking some
of its warplanes in the United States (support for a mainland U.S.
Israeli military force if needed there?).
26) Support for a nation that, by May 2001, had shot 20 foreign
journalists during their coverge of the Palestinian uprising against Israeli
subjegation and oppression. "The Israeli government is refusing to
deal with [this]," complained Howard
Goller, chairman of the Foreign Press Association.
27) Support for a country that has been sued
-- as a nation -- by another country (Thailand) for institutionalized
exploitation and rip-offs of (of course non-Jewish) Thai workers in the
Jewish state.
28) Increased corruption by an American government that is completely
out of touch with its citizen constituents who ARE NOT Jewish,
a government that refuses a foreign policy that would benefit those who
make no Judeocentric demands. An example of this is the January request
by the state of Israel for nearly $12 billion in charity (a sum larger
than the U.S. aid given to ALL countries on the planet the prior year).
This outrageous sum request was expected to be granted,
even while the Bush administration refused American states a "$674
million economic stimulus package."
29) Increased repression of American citizens and the curtailing
of traditional freedoms and privacy. This is in direct response to the
threat of Muslim "terrorists," which is at root a last ditch
attempt to throw out Jewish -- and Western imperialism -- from their lands.
The very foundation of the "radical" Islamic complaint is even
systematically and TOTALLY obscured in the Judeo-centric mass media. Bin
Laden has expressly complained about Jewish oppression, and this is not
allowed to become part of popular argument for debate in America.
30) Support for a country whose citizens dominate eveything from
the illegal drug "ecstasy" distribution
into the Western world to hashish monopolies in parts of India.
31) Support for "the world's best-known and most efficient
'secret' manufacturer of weapons of mass destruction
[including a] nuclear, biological and chemical warfare programme that
even the Israeli Knesset cannot get access to, let alone the United Nations."
This includes Nazi-like Israeli research into an "ethnic bomb"
wherein "deadly micro-organisms" attack only those with distinctive
Arab genes. Science fiction? Horror movie? A joke? It's for real.
32) And, to top this all off with a nice black cherry, there are
worries in Israel that organized crime and other
assorted scoundrels are taking over the ruling political party, the
Likud.
Please note that this mere sampling of corruption and immorality
represents a country that has always been declared by American Jews to
be EXEMPLARY of "Jewish values" in its "mission"
to enlighten the world. These people obviously are living in chronic denial.
Or they just don't care what Israel has become. Please also note that
according to one recent study by Jewish organizations,
over 90% of those who responded to a survey of American Jews declared
that they at least "somewhat supported" the Jewish state.
We live in an American society where it is taboo to criticize the Jewish
community. We live in a society where a profoundly Jewish prominence in
the upper tiers of the mass media, government,
the publishing world, the formal intelligentsia,
the art world, and popular
culture at-large ensure an iron bias towards Jewish ethnocentrism
and support of the violent and corrupt Jewish state, aka "Racketstan."
Innocent Americans, subjected to pro-Israel Jewish dominance in government,
mass media and lobbying efforts in every corner on behalf of Israel, overwhelmingly
side with the Jewish state in their conflict with the Palestinians. In
a 2002 poll of Americans by the Pew Research Center
for the People and the Press, 41 percent of those surveyed sided with
Israel to 13 percent for the Palestinians. In contrast, in Europe, where
Jewish power is strong but not as strangling, in every country surveyed
the public sided with the struggle for justice of the Palestinians:
France 36 to 19 percent, Italy 30 to 14, Britain 28 to 17, and even Germany
at 26-24. What do you think the percentage gaps would be in the Muslim
world?
In another recent study in France, the French public even believed Israel
to be one of the primary nations that threatens world peace, second
only to Iraq.
Massive American support of the crimes of Israel by our Zionist puppet-masters
is turning the United States INTO Israel. Massive support of the immoral
foundation of the racist Jewish state has inevitably drawn justifiable
international outrage against the endemic moral bankruptcy of the Israeli
state to OUR door. As the New York Observer proclaimed in
one of its articles, echoing the growing current of this throughout the
world:
"We are all Jewish in our enemy's eyes."
I don't know about you, folks, but is it really too much
to ask to divorce America's fate from self-destructive Jewish neurosis
and its attendant VICTIMHOOD FIST FEAST that has forced
us all to become honorary vengeful Jewish bullies in so much of the world's
eyes?
So we're all Jews now? Can you believe it? It's the ultimate
Jewish revenge against the rest of the humanity for whatever they feel
like complaining about today: a world where even American "anti-Semites,"
are -- by AmeriIsraeli default -- wrestled down, tied up, and garnered
with an honorary yarmulke (religious cap) glued to their heads.
Quick. Which way is the exit that says "Thanks, but no thanks?"
Or has that been stolen too?
|
